>It is truly shameful that I continue to be “no-platformed” by the thought police
I don't know all the facts about this situation, but the author is not writing with substance.
It's a form of logical argument: the writer is poking holes in the "right to free speech = right to a receptive platform" argument made by Sommers and Weiss by swapping the players.
This was published in 2018
It would be interesting to see well-reasoned rebuttals to this argument from the HN crowd.