Hacker News Reader

I understand that, but why is a 23-year old ship considered old? USS Nimitz is nearing 50 years old. Wikipedia [1] lists a bunch of ships built in the 70s and 80s. USS Bonhomme Richard appears to be newer than half the ships there.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_ships_of_the_U...

View on HN

It’s not. Commenters on HN know jack shit about this topic but love commenting like they have any idea. It’s the thing HN is most known-for: non-experts speaking out of their ass with top-tier confidence.

Edit: it’s not even halfway through its projected lifecycle.

hey now...most of us speak out our ass with top-tier confidence about things we ARE experts in. Don't limit us.

Well. Given that I've planned and rehearsed operations with this exact ship, I'll stand by my comment - this ship and its guts are hardly new. In colloquial terms - "old."

It’s not old. It’s not new. Wasp classes have a half-century lifespan. It’s one of the newest Wasp classes to be commissioned. You still have plankholders on active duty. By ship standards this is not an old ship.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com