Beauty has more to do with culture (what do we consider good looking and what not) but there's also an objective beauty that has to do with body proportion for example
Beauty has more to do with culture (what do we consider good looking and what not) but there's also an objective beauty that has to do with body proportion for example
Spending money on the right things can make a large difference. Teeth, skincare, diet, haircut, clothes, time in the gym, quitting a job that would keep you in the sun too long, ...
Take this picture before after of Cristiano Ronaldo, for example:
https://elbocon.pe/resizer/0hZVESd2S5BEAOwYYdT6_FUcIEE=/980x...
https://www.besoccer.com/new/the-20-ugliest-footballers-in-t...
https://www.goal.com/en-us/news/has-cristiano-ronaldo-had-pl...
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confi...
That's not really fair. He was like 16/17 on that first picture.
Ugly rich people either don't care or don't consider the risks worth it.
The same person can look beautiful and ugly depending on all of that.
I thought it was implicit that we're talking about natural beauty without make up perhaps.
And no, beauty does not depends the clothes you wear for example (makeup, yes I second that if is very thick can change the way a person look)