Better said in someone else’s words than my own:
https://mobile.twitter.com/btanderson72/status/1279507428128...
Better said in someone else’s words than my own:
https://mobile.twitter.com/btanderson72/status/1279507428128...
It’s not about what the word meant all along.
“Negro” wasn’t considered a derogatory term for black people for the majority of its history as a word, but today, especially in English, we avoid it because of the legacy it picked up.
You don’t have to admit the word was always racist to believe that we should use some other words in today’s context.
I think this will do harm in two ways:
a) harm because of the explicit association as just described
b) harm because many people (possible supporters) will reject these kind of things as unreasonable
Now, I think the policy itself is not a big thing. Can be done. But it should have included a statement that the underlying idea is perhaps a hit silly and this is done to avoid this distraction.
Once everybody does that, the forest is gone and then, well, game over.