Perhaps Reuters should have waited for more information before writing this article.
Warning about a "potential wave of Covid-linked brain damage" when it's likely to be a rare complication is not responsible journalism.
Warning about a "potential wave of Covid-linked brain damage" when it's likely to be a rare complication is not responsible journalism.
And over here modmans is accusing me of thinking Covid19 is over blown, while you accuse me of cognitive dissonance. It seems to me that you simply dislike any suggestion that Covid19 is less serious than you think, while other people dislike any suggestion that Covid19 is more serious than they think.
Here's what I think: I think honest, factual discussion of this topic is important, and that includes considering all facets of the evidence. I think describing a rare complication as a "potential wave" is overblown. And I think the level of discussion of this topic, even here on HN, is among the worst I've ever seen.