Is Ghislaine Maxwell secretly one of the most powerful Redditors of all time?
inputmag.com
inputmag.com
Assuming that they post almost every day and miss a day every few months, the probability of missing a single day for a random user is probably around 10^-2, so if the account didn't post during her public activities for around 13 times, that gives a 10^26 Bayes factor and thus we can conclude it's her or someone intentionally trying to frame her with 1 - 10^-10 > 6 sigma equivalent certainty.
Obviously a more precise analysis is possible.
Or someone in her orbit/employ who has a radical change of lifestyle and priorities as a direct consequence of the arrest, or...
(Neither endorsing not challenging the basic analysis, just suggesting that one must enlarge the scope of “noncoincidental possibilities” besides Maxwell personally or a frame attempt.)
Hasn't posed in days
> Inciteful Link - Submit something worthwhile but provocative
I think it's a pun on "insightful". Reddit likes puns.
Bill Gates loves to play Bridge, Warren Buffett enjoys playing Ukulele and Maxwell likes to spend time on Reddit.
But I agree, it makes no difference.
pro: The timings are conspicuous. This absence right now as well as that during an earlier known event (the chans found that). Also the aggressive way Reddit admins react to this aligns with similar happenings in the past that turned out true.
con: I just can't imagine her using an account so similar to he real name, and just browsing Reddit all day. Also the content isn't quite as suspicious as one might expect from such a person.
This just feels like a reaching for grapes moment especially so when the person's account has been active in the last 24hrs
This evidence seems weak at best.
I want to be charitable, but hard to imagine this is anything other than an incredible stretching to make a topic to generate lots of clicks/views.
In my opinion, that first statement is very bad. What classifies an either claim or evidence as extraordinary?
The claim "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." itself is extraordinary and would be in dire need of something backing it up. Not extraordinary perhaps, but still.
the proof is paper thin IMO.
Supposing the woman does have a reddit account, what makes that a "conspiracy"? Between whom is any conspiring happening? Is it also a conspiracy that I have a HN account?