Are we expected to believe that it was pulled because they were uncomfortable sharing data with the CCP? There is approximately zero chance of this. So why did they do it?
Are we expected to believe that it was pulled because they were uncomfortable sharing data with the CCP? There is approximately zero chance of this. So why did they do it?
It's absolutely ridiculous a Chinese company would be the first to actually close down the service to protect users, don't you think ?
External and internal optics: anything available in Hong Kong yet unavailable in China is liable to make Hong Kong appear separate of China.
Collective mindset: Western UGC, even if censored to a degree, carries values and notions that threaten CCP’s power and influence over given territory. (I wouldn’t be surprised if TikTok’s Chinese sibling is going to be heavily promoted in Hong Kong, if it isn’t already.)
This move feels very very weird.
Of course, no one in tech believes them. We'll see if the public and governments believe them.
Maybe it is a strategy to deprive HongKong protesters of a platform to post content on?