My dad got scammed for $3k worth of gift cards
thehustle.co
thehustle.co
1) Caller-ID spoofing. It straight out should not be possible to spoof government phone numbers, 911, etc. My Android has "Scam Likely" show up when a scammer calls (I believe this is part of the STIR/SHAKEN protocol), this should be expedited, expanded, and improved upon.
2) Someone should not be able to buy $3000 of Target gift cards without doing a lot of explaining. Personal experience: The grocery store I go to; the registers will straight out refuse to ring up above $500 of gift cards, you have to use the Customer Service desk where their agents grill you (and I do mean grill you, their default mode seems to be "You're being scammed", especially if you're on the phone with someone).
3) If I buy gift cards in New York, there's zero reason someone in Bangalore, India should immediately be able to redeem those gift cards. Perhaps Target could should spend some of their data collection techniques on this instead of trying to figure out if your daughter is pregnant so they can send you maternity coupons.
4) Is there a reason unused gift cards bought within a certain amount of time shouldn't be refundable?
> Once the scammers obtain gift card numbers from a victim, they transfer them to a group of US-based “runners,” who liquidate and launder the funds — either by buying resellable goods at the store or selling them via gift card resale sites. Some even have their own gift card resale apps.
Between lost cards, the obvious money laundering and tax avoidance grifts, etc, it's a pretty absurd instrument.
My school ended up with a heap of free bananas from a parent :D
https://www.thebalance.com/new-gift-card-rules-for-expiratio...
I personally hate receiving gift cards or commodity gifts. I would rather receive a thoughtful gift (even just a hand-written message) or no gift at all. I don’t want your item or your money, I want your time or your thoughts.
Not to mention that after receiving your gift, I become obligated to give you an equally thoughtless gift. They say it’s the thought that counts, but it seems like that’s exactly what is missing most of the time! I want to skip the business transaction and just get to the part where we appreciate each other.
That said, I’m still not going to look a gift horse in the mouth, but that is my honest preference.
The one interesting thing is that I don’t like buying gifts for other people anymore. If I’m not going to buy my wife a gift, why would I buy you a gift when you are no where near as important to me as she is?
Financial security is a very important factors in marriages. As long as both parties are happy with forgoing gifts, it's a far better long-term gift to each other to be fiscally responsible to the future of the family unit.
That said, there's an onslaught of marketing to convince you to change your mind.
If you do buy clothes, coordinate with others to get clothes for various sizes/ages. But cash and a suggestion of clothes is probably better anyway.
For my wife and myself, we usually just 'gift' something like a short holiday or a nice thing we'd been meaning to get. But it's kind of abstract when the money belongs to both of us anyway - the main gift is that the giver goes to more effort in planning it, or gives up some of their own preferences in deference to what the receiver would prefer.
Obligated gift giving is pretty annoying as you say. Much nicer to see something and think of it on the spur of the moment.
But even beyond that some gifts that could be bought are valuable to the recipient disproportionately to what it cost for the giver to purchase them, for a variety of reasons.
My point is that those are the same reasons that recipients value gift cards more than the same cash amount (though to a lesser extent).
With a gift card the recipient can get what they want.
I don't see how any of that is brilliant. Might as well write a check. Or just don't bother with a gift at all. It's what I do with most people I don't care enough about.
Giving cheque/cash feels tacky to me.
Gift cards have the added benefit to the gifter that, upon being spent, the giftee has a chance to associate them with the purchased good or service. Cash and check, being added to an amorphous fungible pool, confer no such benefit for the gifter.
What I haven't figured out is where on these axes lies a printed-out QR code granting ownership of a Bitcoin wallet. Unfortunately Google tells me these actually exist: https://bitcoinpaperwallet.com/holiday-design/
Usually, they'd send a banknote in perfect condition, or a cheque if it was by post.
I'm now too old for these gifts, but my youngest sibling gets the same instructions, and a future-dated transfer to his bank account.
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3akq2q/e...
Basically, when we go somewhere new, we look for bank branches or sometimes supermarkets that cater to old people and ask for weird coins. Depending on the bank, tellers sometimes end up carrying these in their drawers for weeks and are happy to unload them. Locally, they know her and sometimes save coins. You develop a sense for banks that are more productive for this -- a more modern bank have staff who don't know what nickels are! :)
Sometimes you get lucky. A few years ago, my wife and my son came back with about $200 of eisenhowers, including a few silver ones. They basically bought $1200 worth of coins for $200! Some kid/grandkid probably turned in grandmas stuff.
East Asian cultures tend to stick to the "red envelope of cash".
I'm curious how much businesses have had inroads into swaying cultures to believe that gifts and gift cards are more desirable than cash. Economists historically have talked about how gifts are frequently inefficient uses of money because there is value loss when it isn't the most desired item at the time.
These kinds of people like to think of themselves as smart when in reality they are just selfish.
Any action that cannot sustainably be extended to everyone else in the world should be considered suspect as to whether it's actually good.
This rules out lots of things that society accepts as fine. Although perhaps that's your intent.
I've worked at both kinds of companies (receipt and reimbursement vs straight per diem based on location) and much preferred the one that handed me my per diem as cash in an envelope before the trip started. Less bookkeeping on the company's end, and if I decide to be frugal on the trip for whatever reason I've just rewarded myself with a small bonus. Seems like everyone's incentives are aligned in that case.
I caught a guy doing this, probably skimmed $400 a week for years. People do crazy stuff... One group of CEs I knew were renting apartments and AirBnbing themselves.
It becomes really unethical when the drafter of these policies also benefit from it.
How do you feel like we could enforce #3? I suspect someone would use a VPN to fool any location/verification system, or is there something else going on here?
RE: Target data collection Determining if someone is pregnant so they can find ways to get that person to shop at Target drives their bottom line. What incentive is there to invest as much in preventing scammers from succeeding? I don’t know what the solution is, but doing something (even an information campaign) is better than nothing at all.
I don't know that full Know Your Customer laws should be in force here with gift cards, but both Target and the bank that facilitates these transactions should be doing more to prevent these.
I don't see why data collection is necessary here, if gift cards are such a fraud vector, why not put a 24hr delay in activation on gift card purchases over a $100 to give scammees a chance to understand what happaned and prevent the scammers from profiting.
Breaking interoperability with the world's installed base of circuit switched, 25+ year old PSTN equipment is not on the table for the big phone carriers.
That should be illegal. Foreign calls, if they're really running against PSTN tech limitations (which I doubt as I thought offshore calls were all routed via internet) then they could easily create hardware to blank out offshore calls caller ID info (and preferably replace with just the international dialling code).
But then your bank would have to admit where their call centres are, and they pay more to phone companies than individual customers do.
Which comes to why there's no legislation (in UK) demanding action from local phone companies; presumably because they pay the politicians more than we do too.
Every call should be possible to report and the last organisation which can't justify the caller ID sent gets fined for each such call. Ideally this will end up with a scammer. If not possible, it will end up with a telco which will assign blame on their international partner until they get cut off. No properly run telco wants to get cut off from sending calls to a large country.
But the fines have to start due to correct regulation which applies to everyone.
It's fine if providers trust each other as long as they only do that after verifying that the other party is trustworthy, and quickly fix it if that turns out to be a wrong assumption.
Unfortunately, the gift card is an item that is intended to be easy to give to other people, just like cash. This doesn't seem like an easy problem to solve.
I think (4) has the most chance of success. Even just adding a 4 hour "activation time" on cards worth more than $250 would make the scam just a little harder to pull off, and real consumers would rarely be inconvenienced. The guy in this story would have realized he was scammed and had ~4 hours after the call to try to fix the situation.
The real problem is that merchants are not incentivized to fix the problem as they make money from it.
That's a good idea.
Implicit in this idea is that victims can call a customer help number and get gift card balances frozen and reversed. I don't know if this is possible to do right now.
If so, fraudsters might start up a new scam. Buy $1000 in Target gift cards, spend the money at Target, call up Target and claim that a scammer stole the funds, and then get $1000 back, netting $2000.
Target would have to build a new department just to adjudicate gift card claims. At which point it might decide that it's just not worth the hassle of issuing gift cards.
Frequently as I am in the checkout line at Kohl's or Home Depot I'd buy a gift card for myself with the intent to wipe it out in the next few minutes at the checkout (Fluz, for one encourages that, and will send a notification whenever you're near a retailer that's in their network).
Apparently it was $1k at Target and another $2k at Safeway. This was just under the limit of $1030 per person per store at Target. Perhaps the limit should be lower, or employees should be instructed to be more wary.
I imagine Target doesn't want to be too strict here, both because they don't want to inconvenience customers making legitimate purchases, and because they don't want to give up the revenue derived from scammers defrauding people (not that they would ever admit to the latter).
I'll point out that (at least on my phone with T-Mobile), "Scam Likely" comes from T-Mobile's "Scam ID" service. STIR/SHAKEN produces a different message, "Caller Verified", when a caller is confirmed. Source: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/scam-id-and-...
ps. Forward text message SPAM to 7726 - https://www.t-mobile.com/responsibility/privacy/fraud-spam/s...
This seems like something the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau could collect data on and put some sane regulations in place? The gift card industry is poorly regulated in general.
According to the article, that is not what happens; instead, the gift cards are redeemed in the US: 'Once the scammers obtain gift card numbers from a victim, they transfer them to a group of US-based “runners,”'
The runners described above would probably have some kind of presence in most major US cities, and they could just pick a runner in the nearest major city to the victim without raising any location-based red flags. Note that neither Safeway, nor Target have retail stores in Bangalore (or anywhere else in India), only offices.
Why though? One makes them money and the other... also makes them money but by doing nothing about it
Yet it still happened that, during the exact week my family was on a Caribbean cruise that included a stop in Mexico[0], scammers targeted both of my parents' mobile phone numbers insisting that they were alternatively Mexican authorities demanding bail money for me or that they were my spouse sobbing over the phone that I'd been in a tragic boating accident and needed money for the hospital.
This was before international roaming was included with my mobile phone plan so when I got back to port a few days later I turned on my phone that morning to several voicemails from my parents, starting out panicky then realizing what was going on then positively jovial at how they'd played the scammers along for almost a full day.
They didn't send any money but both of them said it was incredibly difficult to keep what I'd told them in mind because "what if it really was you needing help?"
0 - We think the scammers got the information off of the Facebook pages of one of our related family members who posted publicly about "being envious of [my name tagged] going to Cozumel" next week and then trolling linked family members for people who appeared older.
edit: apparently trolling is fine here:
I established this system because it is possible I will be involved in an accident or something and I do want my relatives to be able to trust someone calling if I am unable to do so. Many scams start with news of an accident so this usually stops them before they get to the asking for money part. I also make it explicitly clear that an emergency call would never be a request for money. I have savings and insurance and there is no occasion where I would need money from relatives, ever.
A better approach would be to establish a set of preshared keywords that convey information about what's going on.
Or can you have that person bring the form and show ID?
However, you can list as many people as you like and change it at any time by visiting the school. So we have four or five neighbors listed and my sisters who live in other states.
The countdown timer to when this can be convincingly deepfaked is ticking, but while a pre-recorded video is within realm of possibility (if the scammer can get access to video of the person, which is already hard), being able to fake a live conversation is still a ways off.
Also, I'd tell you to leave a backup card in a separate place from the rest of your belongings, but you've probably learned that the hard way already!
I've also built up a network over the years so I have friends in virtually every major city on the planet. You could literally spin a roulette wheel of cities and drop me into one anywhere on the planet with nothing in my pockets and I'd be fine. People are far more helpful than you realize and of course knowing people helps.
I was completely broke once in one of the most dangerous cities on the planet (San Pedro Sula, Honduras) due to poor planning and a city wide internet outage that took out all ATMs. I also didn't speak any Spanish at the time. This was before I had multiple banks too.
In the end it wasn't really an issue at all, bus driver let me ride for free to the next town and personally escorted me to a safe ATM. Once you've been through things like that a few times you realize most situations just aren't as big a problem as you might think.
> then realizing what was going on then positively jovial at how they'd played the scammers along for almost a full day.
...because once they realize they're talking to an old lady, they may realize the "kidnapping" story may not work, but a call verifying something for a Stimulus check might (for example).
Just hang up. You won't outwit them.
I'd like to think that if enough people did this they wouldn't make any money.
The population density and average income disparity between the US and India works strongly in their favor, however.
There was a video that he kept the scammer on the phone for 6+ hrs then at the end when he was giving them the apple cards was "confused" and redeemed $20000 dollars onto "her" "own" account to send them a computer all on a vm where they could watch her putting in the cards codes and go through the checkout but the control software "was broken" so they couldn't interfere.
edit: Youtuber/twitch streamer is mentioned below, Kitboga
Then there is Jim Browning on YouTube.... I’ll just leave this here: https://youtu.be/le71yVPh4uk
Has that ever happened?
Does a fake recording like that make it easier to scam you in any meaningful way?
Perhaps a pre-established code phrase is a good way to address this. "If I ever need help, I will mention that [memorable vacation] we spent together. If that vacation isn't mentioned explicitly, it's not me."
Seemed kind of silly at the time but it truly is a low cost way to mitigate this issue.
There might be better protocols - make sure all their cash is in the bank, set a per store per week limit of £200 on their cards, require your/siblings authorisation to make larger purchases?
But then there are things like their pensions, who they move their phone/internet account or other utilities to, so much opportunity for malicious people to commit fraud and deception; companies aren't motivated to help as it often reduces the companies income.
And people think Pascal's wager is a good argument and you lose nothing believing in hell.
Your dad was not a gullible man.
My dad was a very aggressive and assertive person throughout his life, didn't trust anyone, lived through some very hard times like post-war Italy where apparently even the feral cats vanished for lack of food.
Then in retirement it's like everything experienced which conditioned him to be that way just faded away. His edge dulled substantially.
The last time I traveled with him we were approached by someone on the streets of Palermo who was obviously (to me) sizing us up. Within minutes of talking with this total stranger my dad had revealed where both his money and passport were kept on his person. I had to abruptly intervene and remove us from the situation by insisting we enter the restaurant we happened to be passing. When I explained to him what had just transpired, he was in complete disbelief at how easily he had been tricked. The whole thing surprised me because my dad was the one objecting to our exploring the south of Italy the entire trip because of the crime and poverty!
Even with him expecting we were going to have such problems he didn't catch it. A previous version of my father would have not only seen it coming, he likely would have escalated it with violence, he's a gruff old Italian sailor. This was like taking candy from a child.
It's incredible how much people change in old age.
My anecdotal story to the contrary of yours: I have a friend who graduated from a top 10 US college a few years ago and couldn't find a job. Right when they were desperately filing for applications and feeling very worried about their future (as recent college graduates are wont to do), this person received a call from 911 that fell exactly into this class:
>Impersonations of government employees accounted for ~60% of these cases.
The "911" was from the local police department of the city where they lived. The person was told that a warrant for their arrest has been issued - that 3 years before, there was a particular document to be filed with the IRS that had to declare all scholarship money awarded for a particular scholarship, and according to their documents, that document is three years overdue and has already incurred $700 in fines. The amount of time elapsed since the due date warranted x many jail days without immediate payment, and a mark on the criminal record... additionally, since this involves defrauding the government, their freshly minted university degree was about to be revoked.
My friend is an immigrant. They didn't know that university degrees couldn't be revoked, nor that no such thing as "government vouchers" bought from a grocery store existed (this was the trick - when the person arrives looking for the vouchers at Target or Office Depot, the agent on the phone says that some gift card can be an acceptable form of payment instead).
I took note of this scam both because of how elaborate it was, how believable it was (especially to someone less than familiar with the US government), how the person on the "911" call used psychological tactics to continue to make this vulnerable person more and more panicked about their future particularly at a time when they were already financially insecure. My friend was not gullible. But my friend did fear repercussions from the US government enough to completely fall for this scam.
The scary thing in noticing this, is knowing that it will happen to me (us all) one day. I'm hoping that by noticing it I can stave it off for as long as possible, but maybe that kind of thinking means I'm already on the track...
These days he is limited to the basics on his PC: email in outlook, checkbook in Quicken, basic web browsing... and he often runs into trouble with them. I'm on TeamViewer about once a month helping with something. He also has an iPhone and iPad but can just barely do the basics on them, watching him try to use them is just painful. Some of that is due to crappy modern UX, especially on the iDevices, but his ability solve tech problems and deal with unexpected situations has dropped off a cliff the last few years. Age is coming for us all...
He's now retired, in his late 70s and beginning to show signs of age related dementia.
Last year he fell for a phone scam from someone claiming to be his ISP, where he was persuaded to install remote desktop software onto his computer and login to internet banking. The scammers weaved a tale about fixing his computer and sending him an "authorisation code" which was actually the SMS code from his bank as they'd added themselves as a new payee. He simply read it out to them.
The scammers transferred just under $10,000 to their account.
Luckily, they'd set off enough red flags that he called me asking why his ISP wanted to know what bank he was with. Once we worked out what had happened we called the bank straight away and were able to get the transfer stopped by the bank just in time. It was a Saturday and he was literally saved by the weekend. Very lucky.
Turns out he was in the process of changing ISPs when the call arrived, so a garden variety phone scam was perfectly targetted.
He live streams calling scammers that are running exactly these sorts of scams, tries to tie them up for as long as possible, wasting their time. It's super educational as well, showing how these scammers try various tactics to keep people afraid.
"Edna: Which of the following would you most prefer? A puppy, a pretty flower from your sweetie, or a large, properly formatted datafile?
Scammer: I would choose the datafile"
He has coding streams where he makes countless tools to take up more time / capture information from scammers. He has a fake bank site he uses to capture banking details of scammers when they try to wire money to themselves from the victim's bank account (he has a relationship with bank fraud teams and law enforcement.)
He's also a talented voice actor and social engineer who can keep scammers on the phone with who they think is his bank for hours. Absolutely worth a watch on YouTube or his Twitch streams if you have a moment.
Kids these days.
I am not a recipient for such scamming but I do receive phone calls on a daily basis, which I started screening of course. If I pick up and don't say anything they will hang up in 5 to 10 seconds. I think they're harvesting for potential victims.
Although his practices are more... grey hat, he's managed to successfully shutdown whole companies. He provided content for a BBC documentary too: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000fzx2
Even though he regularly sends information to authorities, it is very rare that they will do anything.
He might not be as "fun" and whacky as some of the other baiters, but it his videos can be quite interesting. He will sometimes figure out the hierarchy and layout of their company and network, their physical locations, business fronts, etc so that he can methodically take down the company.
Here's the same scam from his stream 3 days ago: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/668914814?t=5h4m20s Abandoned Toyota Corolla on the south border of Texas with blood, _exactly_ 22 pounds of cocaine, cash. Multiple bank accounts and addresses registered with your SSN, funds wired out of the US.
I recently encountered an elderly woman fiddling with some purchased gift cards (at CVS) while talking to someone on her cell phone. They threatened to disconnect her power immediately if she didn’t pay for a new meter immediately. Luckily I convinced her to not share the numbers and hang up on the scammer. It took her a while to even trust me. Poor woman had no idea who to trust. I had her call the local utility who was super patient explaining the situation and consoling her.
This article attempts to blame Target a couple of times for not doing enough. But this guy was also sitting in another store's parking lot, Safeway, reading off gift card codes to the "DEA."
No matter how smart you think your loved ones are, placing scrutiny on the stores the scammers have chosen (especially as a journalist) is going to do little except to add purchasing restrictions for everyone. A 17-year-old minimum wage cashier isn't going to save your dad, it's the last place to look to combat these "psychological tactics."
Every other business that deals with the transfer of money (banks, for example) is expected to put strong measures in place to make sure that the money is traceable and that they're not helping criminals. Why shouldn't large companies like Target be held to a similar standard?
Moreover, the incentives here are very worrying. Yes this guy got scammed out of $3k, but Target also got $3k in revenue. Without some sort of penalty/punishment, Target is incentivized to do the bare minimum to minimize their PR exposure (which they can do by saying "we take this very seriously and have adopted some new policies" but not really acting on it) but to otherwise allow this to keep happening. As the prevalence of these gift card scams has skyrocketed, so have gift card sales for these large companies.
The Safeway in this story didn’t make any money off of that $2k purchase of Target cards and it could’ve saved/boosted its reputation if it had some better protective measures in place. It also means that maybe people who would’ve spent money at Safeway now can’t because they’ve lost several thousand dollars.
That seems dubious, considering they dedicate precious shelf and display space to selling them. Accounting can get crazy in the real world, but clearly they have a motive to move these things. The cards are on the shelf because the cards make money for the store, somehow.
If you do a search for something like "gift card distribution", there seems to be a bunch of marketing firms that you can pay to get gift cards made and put in stores.
I worked at a store years ago and we had all these things implemented:
- Limit on gift card purchase amounts per customer, per day.
- Stopped stocking Western Union cards because they were such a scam target.
- There was also a scam where scammers would call the store itself to pose as a "corporate employee" who was "trying to verify that the gift card redemption system was working" and would have the cashier activate a gift card, run it as cash, and read off the numbers. And apparently that worked well enough that every time we activated certain gift cards, a massive box popped up on the POS screen saying "IF THIS TRANSACTION IS HAPPENING OVER THE PHONE, HANG UP IMMEDIATELY AND CANCEL THE TRANSACTION."
At a certain point there's only so much that can be done by the store itself.
It involved multiple scammers calling them, claiming to be the IRS. They had personal details about the victim (gleaned from public records, no doubt). When the victim agreed to make a payment under threat of arrest, they were told the government doesn't take credit card payments over the phone, but a special agreement with Amazon allowed them to accept gift cards as they are guaranteed value and "as good as cash."
From a distance it sounds ridiculous, but it was a surprisingly complex con with multiple participants and enough plausible details to make them seem legitimate. Refusing to take your credit card number over the phone must also disarm victims, what scammer would do so?
Because it is ridiculous. There is nothing you could say that would make that sound legitimate to an otherwise intelligent, cautious person.
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/woman-loses-entire-life...
It would take a stupid person to believe a scam like that, wouldn't it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_investors_in_Bernard_L...
While the majority of people who fall for this are elderly and aren’t as sharp as they used to be, they aren’t the only ones who are successfully tricked.
I mean, every rule does have exceptions. People are wired to think that way, because that's how it is. So manipulation can work by triggering that frame of mind.
I think it is foolish and wishful thinking to think we are immune to being scammed just because we can see through all these ruses when we read about them online.
Whenever something bad happens to other people, our immediate first reaction is to find out reasons why it would never happen to us. We wouldn't fall for it, I wouldn't put myself in that situation, I would see it a million miles away, I would have done this instead..... this is a defense mechanism because we don't want to feel vulnerable... we want to think that bad things are preventable, and we would always prevent the bad things.
This is simply not realistic, and gets in the way of empathy for people in bad situations. Just think back in your own life when things went wrong, and how looking back there are always things you could have done differently... but you didn't, because you are human and make mistakes and didn't have perfect knowledge of what was going on like you do in hindsight.
> My dad had received robocalls in the past and ignored them. But this one was different: it was a real, authoritative person on the line who knew his full name and address.
Earlier, the article reported that scammers get this personal information from data brokers and it struck me that this is a reason why people should care about privacy and who they trust with their personal data. This data could end up being used against them – or their loved ones.
This is a key point worth mentioning in any "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" discussions about online tracking and the dangers of giving away private information to websites, big or small. Once the data is out there, it's available to any company with deep enough pockets to purchase it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/11/11/244545556/the-...
But some states use a plain-old .com, and the sites aren't well done, so they look sketchy, even when they're legit. Worse, they sometimes have URLs like comeclaimyourmissingmoneythatyouforgotaboutandwereholdingforyou.com
If you're curious about missing money, go to the web site of the Secretary of State in every state where you've lived or gone to school. There's usually a link.
It's not always the Secretary of State; e.g., in California unclaimed property is the domain of the State Controller’s Office:
For California, the site is https://ucpi.sco.ca.gov/UCP/Default.aspx
Same is true of banks and such. A few months ago, I got a mortgage, and I was totally blown away by how much profoundly suspicious shit that was actually legit happened. Like, I'd get calls from totally random new people from the mortgage company, no warning by anyone who I actually knew that this new person was calling, often from their personal cellphones---and it would turn out that the call was totally legit, and I actually was supposed to send more sensitive financial documents to this random new person. Totally bonkers.
Even brands themselves are getting in on the game of trying to abuse people's attention with deceptive messaging.
It is like they are trying to make things easy for scammers
I am working on a refinance right now, and I agree... so many things I am having to do seem ridiculous.
I'm shocked that Target just simply allows people to purchase so much in gift cards all at once. I'm even more shocked that banks and transaction processors don't mark this as suspicious or fraudulent.
But this isn't just a function of irresponsible companies. The elderly are overwhelmed by technology, and it's too difficult to know what's real and what isn't. After the scam, my neighbor had a near panic attack when she received an innocuous Google security checkup email. How was she supposed to know it was authentic or not?
There should certainly be more checks and balances around that. Perhaps a personal limit, and requiring a registered business to be the purchaser above that. Or perhaps a redemption system.
But the incentive is not there for the stores. It’s of course better to sell gift cards than the equal amount of merchandise for them
Ask HN: How do you protect your parents from tech scammers?
simple... they call me first.
if there is one thing i have _never_ done to my parents, or _anyone_ for that matter, is make fun of them if they call me and ask me for my professional opinion in tech matters. this has extended to situations when they think the situation is shoddy like they are being taken in a scam. i think _this_ is the single reason why my parents have never fell victim to scams. i feel that _most_ parents, or elderly people for that matter, fall victim cause they feel pressure from both ends... the first being the scammers themselves, the second being scared to ask _anyone_ if the situation is legit for fear of being made fun of.
_noone_ should feel scared of being ridicule when asking any question regarding their safety or well-being.
I had a text from her when I woke up the other day, she'd bought a new phone and now the company was asking weird questions.
I figure for sure it's a scam and I phoned her immediately. But I gradually realised it's actually not what I thought. I normally buy phones by just... buying a phone, like a cheeseburger or a T-shirt, cash or card. But she's got a new phone on contract, so that's a credit deal and the questions they're asking, though prying, are credit agency ID confirm questions. Where you've lived, photo of a passport, stuff like that. The firm seems legit, they're not new to the business, they have a relationship to a Credit Reference Agency that I've worked with before, so it's probably fine.
She seems reassured that I'd actually thought through why this might be OK, and so long as her new iPhone shows up in the next few days all is good, otherwise I guess I need to walk her through anti-fraud processes in case somebody got all that as precursor to taking out credit in her name.
With my mother I got a call from her one day because her PC was literally screaming. She'd clicked a link or visited a web site or something and now it was constantly loudly demanding she phone the scammers and give them money to "unlock" it. She'd had the peace of mind to instead walk into another room and call me. I talked her through switching it off, bringing it up in safe mode and forgetting the (hijacked) default page on the browser. Relatively simple scam, but I expect it's effective on too many people.
I probed a little bit since I was curious how he perceived it and he effectively said the idea of getting a deal took the best of him.
There's been a few times where I've found out after the fact that the deal really was real, but I'd rather miss out on a good deal than get scammed.
I personally ignore almost any phone call from unknown numbers these days because so many are scammy or robocalls. I figure that if anyone really needs me, they'll leave a message.
I know some elderly folks who I thought were in pretty good shape mentally and such got pulled into one of those scams. It was the grandchild calling for money from jail type thing.
I never would have thought they would have fallen for a scam like that, they did.
You can never talk too early to older folks about this stuff. Lay down some hard and fast rules such as "Never give out info / anything to someone who calls you first, call them at a number you look up on your bank statement, or call someone directly. Call me / alternate person if someone asks your for information or money, etc."
Scammers have excuses of course but some of those rules will work.
I think that's a stereotype, rather than a rule. I've seen articles in the newspaper occasionally where the victim is a person in their 30's or 40's.
I suspect that we don't hear a lot about that because there isn't a lobbying or information group like the AARP for 30-somethings. Also, losing $250 to a scammer is less tragic for a younger victim with a full-time job than it is for a 70-year-old on SNAP, so they don't talk about it as much.
When I worked in a large office with very ordinary, I saw people of all ages falling for scams. They just didn't know they were scams until it was all over, and then they just stopped talking about it.
It has gotten to the point where they really need me to assist them with all most everything related to managing their computers. Unfortunately I am 1000 miles away so we struggle on the phone to get things sorted out.
What recommendations do people have for being able to remotely manage windows machines. I am on windows 10 and they are still using w7. I'd like to be able to remote into their machine with admin rights so I can manage software, finances, etc.
thanks for any advice.
Or switch them to Linux. For browsing/mail it's perfect. And if they want to have Windows games then make a separate partition where they play there and cut access to internet for that Windows installation.
My dad switched to Xubuntu a few years ago and has been singing praise of it ever since. It's a pretty straight forward desktop environment that isn't prone to frequent radical changes like some other DEs. I think it's an ideal DE for somebody with basic browsing/mail requirements.
Maybe I should transition to him to Linux and FF at this point...
Somewhat ironically, it's also what scammers tend to use.
For security reasons the account you access in Remote Assistance is the account requesting help, and UAC prompts on the remote machine (anything on the "secure desktop") are not remoted, and have to be agreed to by the person you are assisting. However, if you have setup an Admin account on that machine, you can still use any RunAs tools of your choice/familiarity (runas.exe, Shift Right Click Run as User, PowerShell Start-Process -Credential) to escalate to your Admin account (so long as they don't need you to input your password on the "secure desktop").
A couple weeks ago I fixed my moms android phone from my Mac in a different country!
It's sad that this has become so common as to actually need these kind of warnings. I understand if you're paying a ransomware threat and know that the guy on the other end of the line is a scumbag, but, I can't imagine how someone gets fooled into thinking the FBI/IRS/other three-letter agency would accept iTunes gift cards as tender, much less demand it.
...I'm curious about how many people however, are totally fooled by the scammer--everything is very realistic up to a point--but then get to the part about paying the IRS in...iTunes gift cards. "Like, what?...[click]". 90 percent? 10 percent? Maybe no one.
What worked for my mom was to have her listen to an NPR radio show where they investigated this sketchy world. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/08/18/544448670/epis... and https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2016/01/29/464859624/epis....
Once she was able to see the system behind the calls, that screened out 90+%. There are still banks that call her every week to try and convince her to refinance her mortgage on terrible terms. The best antidotes to this are financial security (even if what you're telling me is true, I don't need to do it to make ends meet), financial literacy, and hard-and-fast rules.
1. Never give any information over the phone. Particularly financial or identifying information.
2. If you feel sold or pressured, tell the person that you need to go to the bathroom, and that you'll call them back. Then, call me and we'll talk through it together.
I got a couple phone calls from my mom over the next couple weeks, but they built her confidence to the point where she can spot the scams out very clearly now.
I can't imagine how difficult this would be, if my parents had short-term memory loss or worse. This industry is really soul-crushing, and the FCC needs to stomp it out.
1) Gift card = scam. Always, 100% of the time. No government agency and no legitimate company will ask for payment via gift cards, ever. My in-laws nearly got scammed by "Apple support" calling to say their router had been hacked and was being used for illegal activity and that they needed to pay using iTunes gift cards to have "Apple support" "clean out their router".
2) Nothing is immediately urgent. Unless someone is dying in front of you, the problem can be solved later. Banks, government bureaucracies, lawsuits, etc all work via snail mail and lawyers and paperwork, not by calling you up and telling you you're going to jail and are going to lose all your money unless you do something immediately.
3) Never, ever, ever tell anyone anything if they contacted you. If it's the bank calling, or the government, or insurance, or the power company, or anyone else, say "Thanks, I'll call you back". Hang up the phone, wait an hour then find the phone number yourself (look on your bank card or whatever) and initiate contact with the company.
Same goes for emails. DON'T click links in emails. Delete the email. Wait an hour or two then research the phone number to call and initiate contact.
I will never even have a phone conversation with someone that called me (other than friends, of course)
Unless you are in England I don't believe they can hold up your line for minutes after you hang up.
I wonder if having a duress as well as normal password (like in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx77j1vl4d8) is useful, but obviously if the caller is pretending the person is incapacitated, that goes out the window.
1. Between TMobile's "Name ID" app, and Google's call scammer screening, I very, very rarely get any scam calls through anymore. That's a huge change from recent experience for me.
2. I absolutely love Android's "screen calls" feature, where it does speech-to-text over the phone. 9 times out of 10 it just discourages scammers from going further.
3. Most importantly I think is just to train (and practice!) people that if they don't recognize a caller, just hang up. Don't talk, don't apologize, nothing, just hang up. People are socially conditioned to think that's rude, etc., but it today's age, that is by far the safest thing to do.
BTW: I recommend Maria Konnikova's book "The Confidence Game"
https://www.amazon.com/Confidence-Game-Fall-Every-Time/dp/01...
Fortunately, her daughter was able to recoup the funds from the banks.
Yes, very likely poor, desperate and also under duress by their “managers” to meet their quotas. It doesn’t absolve them of their sins though. The system might even be gamified for these callers and they lose sense of their own morality at some point if they have any.
This scam has been going for so long yet the authorities don’t seem to be doing enough either in US or here in India. I wish someone powerful enough takes this scam head-on and uproot the whole system. It really preys upon one of the most vulnerable members of our society and we should collectively do something about it.
/rant
The other apps and services out there operate on a blacklist model. They block calls they know to be bad. My app turns that around and operates on a whitelist model.
That being said, I had to help my aunt out some in getting it working, but now I am confident that she won't be scammed again.
Despite all the normal warnings we give our elders, in the heat of the moment, the scammers know how to take advantage of them. The best thing is to not allow them to ring their phone.
If anyone cares, my app is in the app stores, and available 100% free for basic usage.
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/robostopper-block-spam-calls/i...
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.codeheadla...
There are times that you do want anyone to call you, or you don't even want unknown callers to leave a voicemail.
My friend's mother would freak out with every little thing always, including the voicemails from robotic voices saying their SSN will be invalid unless they call back at some weird number.
So my friend got the app on her mother's phone and set it to the strictest mode, and her mom hasn't freaked out anymore. This only works because she uses her phone for talking with family members and a few doctor offices.
Basically gift cards are unspendable the same day they are purchased, giving people q day to cancel.
I would think most legitimate gift cards are not spent the same day they are purchased.
He was a smart man. But as he got older he would lose patience with websites and just click on anything .. ANYTHING to get the popups to go away. Which had the inevitable result.
This is despite me telling him not to do that. And if his computer started acting up, just mail it to me and I'd reload it for him. But he didn't want to "be a bother" and his pride meant he would refuse to admit to himself that he had been taken.
Talk to your parents, be patient and explain it's not a bother, that everyone eventually gets affected by the scammers. And that you're more than willing to help them.
There are no legitimate businesses that take gift card payments. Even trading/buying gift cards locally is risky because one could take a picture of the gift card and use the code before the buyer.
Apple does this at its stores. I bought a gift card there just before the pandemic, and the clerk read me disclaimer text about scammers and gift cards, and then I had to sign the statement on his iPhone before I could pay.
Maybe they convince themselves that the supposed law enforcement officer is actually asking for a bribe?
Or possibly I just have too sanguine view of humanity.
If I don't do it someone else will.
If they're dumb enough to fall for it, they deserved it.
Some think that everyone in the target country they're calling is rich and/or insured and/or will get reimbursed by their government anyway, so it's more like shoplifting (from an insurance company or the government) than stealing from a person.
Scammers rarely work alone.
For most, it's just a job. One that pays decently well. In most cases the companies(yes, companies) involved maintain the appearances of a normal call center, with sales targets and everything.
One such scam company was even providing Japanese language training, so they could target a market that's less disputed.
Add that your scam call center employee might have family to feed, and suddenly scamming the rich senior's retirement fund seems like a minor transgression...
But not as skewed as the ones running the whole operation.
I personally think what the scammers are doing is no more morally corrupt than Nike paying workers fifty cents an hour to make a pair of shoes for $2 than they sell for $400, or health insurance companies denying coverage to people literally dying in the name of profits.
All of the above (and scammers) are extremely morally corrupt and "wrong", the only difference is some of them have been normalized.
In the book, a boy -the author- suffers severe neglect and betrayal, and grows up a criminal. Thief, mostly. His motives are complex.
He tends to see others as prey, there is the passion for the chase, he is fascinated by the criminal side of life. He seems quite smart and inventive, thinks his crimes through, but does not care too much about morals. Prison is a risk of the job. Otoh, close friends and partners are respected and can trust him.
It was a strange, interesting mix. I nevertheless hope I never meet the author.
Nobody ever wakes up in the morning and says, "What I am going to do today is evil, and I'm okay with that."
When I thought through each of the examples of society-wide atrocities,
examining them through the new lens I had gained in that deposition room,
immediately I saw it: In every single case where people cooperated with evil, they used eloquent lies to assure
themselves that what they were doing was actually good.2. Victims are insured, they will get their money back from their government.
I rarely answer my phone if it's a number I don't know (if it's important it will come in the mail or they will leave a message) and always call back a number I lookup online to handle things like CC Fraud calls.
I'm not trying to pretend the manipulation isn't effective or say this person should have seen through the scam but I just cant see myself buying gift cards and reading them out over the phone to a "government agent" no matter how much info they had on me.
I would love to listen to a successful scam phone call (not one where the person being scammed is trolling them but a real case of getting scammed) to better understand this.
First, if someone asks you to make ANY payment through Gift cards, assume it is a scam and move on. Hang up. Even if tehy are claiming that you son/daughter just had an accident or was arrested.
If you do get someone to tell you that your family member is arrested/in an accident and needs immediately help, tell them to txt you the address of where they are and you will take care of the rest. Hang up then.
The Govt. never calls and asks for money on phone. They do call sometimes but will always send paper mail when it comes to money matters.
If you are not sure, hang up and call back yourself after checking the legit number online through the main website. Never call a number that is from your voicemail etc.
I have all my accounts locked down to a reasonable daily spending limit (far lower than $3,000) , if I have a large expense then I have to call my credit union or credit card company to to a temporarily increase on that spending limit.
Also why do people still answer unknown numbers. I NEVER answer a number that is not in my phone already. If I don't know you, you can leave a message and I might call you back maybe (unlikely)
There's websites where you can buy "used" gift cards and I wonder how many of these are cards from scammers that are now turning them over for cash.
I got a voice mail from the IRS literally days after I got a letter from them. It was hard not to panic, and google the number.. Then
I get chinese phone scam voicemails all the time. Its clever because I can't understand them, but if I was a Chinese speaker, it would seem like it was for me.
I like to think I'm savy, but these tales serve as a cautionary guide..
The system works, except when my kids are at school and my paranoia makes me assume every call is about them.
I don’t think you get to say that anymore. It is hard to judge the people we know correctly, but of the many steps, thinking the government would want payment immediately in gift cards must be the biggest gullible jump.
But this is not what happened.
Yes it is.
Cognitive decline must surely play a role here.
This is a nice and simple scammer-time-waster script.
What dots do you need to connect to feel it is totally neccessary to buy gift-cards for the FBI?
We need better controls over calling, source numbers etc..
And since I know this is an unwelcome opinion here would anyone care to tell me why I'm so wrong or why they disagree?