A perhaps philosophical question: if you have to train yourself to be able to perceive the higher-quality audio, do you end up enjoying the audio more, or are you just training yourself to dislike the lower-quality audio?
It's similar to listening to a song over good headphones instead of crappy notebook speakers for example
You start hearing all the details that were added to the sound.
It's like seeing a movie on the cinema rather than in a small TV for example
Regular display pixels only became annoying after using a Retina display for a while and then going back. They were fine before.
C.f. any other record with good dynamic range and interesting stuff below 80Hz.
Not really. I noticed fewer headaches and eyes getting dry less often after about a month.
Would you prefer to be blind because if you can see you can also see a dead body?
Why not watch high-resolution images of corpses? People working in medicine do this all the time.
You’re clearly making a Luddite argument: under the circumstances of two things being the same but one of them providing a worse resolution anyone reasonable would pick the higher resolution, because you can always go back to a lower resolution but not vice-versa.
A Luddite argument would suggest all media was better at lower resolution, but that’s not what I am saying. Rather specific media for specific people is. Clearly some people want all the gory details even if I don’t.
PS: > you can always go back to a lower resolution
Having a preference is not the same as having a willingness to edit every YouTube video etc I see.