Twiter phasing out traditional words for “more inclusive ones”
mobile.twitter.com
mobile.twitter.com
The small exception is I'd like to know the context for the "avoid gendered pronouns" one. I'm absolutely fine with using they for a generic unnamed person (e.g. "the user") but when referring to a named individual, if their preferred pronoun is he or she, I hope Twitter will continue to use that.
I'm sure someone could reply with a list of over-the-top examples of trying-to-be-inclusive language, or controversial ones (e.g. the kind JK Rowling complained about) but the ones in this list all look like boring, uncontroversial, won't-hurt-anyone examples.
I wonder how they will tackle that in translations
I really do wish we got anything at all than this token gesture. These changes are good, but what good does not calling the main branch "master" do for a programmer still getting paid way less than her colleagues?
Could you point me to a source for this?
I for one will not change my language. My words mean what they are intended to mean. I may be black-balled for doing so, but at least I'm not actually a racist.