That's funny. The very first thing you learn on a ship is to watch out for exactly this. Any ship that maintains it's position relative to yours is on a collision course!
That's funny. The very first thing you learn on a ship is to watch out for exactly this. Any ship that maintains it's position relative to yours is on a collision course!
That seems to be a weird way of describing "steer so the target is always in center of the image".
Instead you want to intercept the target. You want to reach the point where the target will be, and at the same time as you. So keep the target to the side, at a constant angle.
If you instead steer so the target’s bearing doesn’t change, and ignore whether that bearing is in the center or somewhere else, the missiles are much more likely to hit.
There’s no need to estimate position and speed of objects and then extrapolate them to predict whether course collide and how long that will take. It’s easier to directly derive that from optical information (think of it this way: if that train is 10% as far away, and also goes 10% faster, it will still hit you at the same time. That’s a degree of freedom brains don’t have to solve for)
(Couldn’t find a really good link. You’ll have to do with https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_psychology, http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Optic_flow#Active_and_ec..., https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-04-28-mn-59922-...)