Heated seats as a service? BMW wants to sell car features on demand
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
The door refused to open. It said, "Five cents, please." He searched his pockets. No more coins; nothing. "I'll pay you tomorrow," he told the door. Again it remained locked tight. "What I pay you," he informed it, "is in the nature of a gratuity; I don't have to pay you."
"I think otherwise," the door said. "Look in the purchase contract you signed when you bought this conapt."
...he found the contract. Sure enough; payment to his door for opening and shutting constituted a mandatory fee. Not a tip.
"You discover I'm right," the door said. It sounded smug.
From Ubik, by Philip K. Dick. Published by Doubleday in 1969 http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=1615
With a feature like this which involved hardware that is useless to non-subscribers those non-subscribers are paying a penalty of the extra energy their car uses to haul around the extra hardware.
As a matter of principle, I'd be fine with making it illegal to include such features on new cars. Any hardware you include in the car has to be functional without a subscription.
They could still sell a subscription seat warmer. They just could not include the hardware with the car. They would have to wait for the customer to actually order the subscription and then install the hardware.
Where do private property enthusiasts stand on this? Do they support the idea of these contracts as voluntary, or oppose them because it erodes the whole concept of private property and ownership?
And $10k to wipe the last 8 hours of location data...
Trying to sell us on the idea that we can customise the car to our liking. Put out one version of every model car and just look people pick the color & engine size.
Don't own Tesla but god-damn do I like that every model is gonna be the same tech wise (excluding the Full Self Driving and battery size)
Not 300 different possible combinations.