If companies were made responsible for their packaging, this kind of scheme could more easily become economical.
But even so, for many things, just reduced/alternative packaging would be a huge win.
An egregious example is shampoo. Especially the ones with pump-action dispensers (I won't even mention the glitter/plastic-microbeads that many shampoos contain). These containers use a good deal of plastic, and are surely bad for the environment. An alternative would be that you own a nice pump-action dispenser, and buy shampoo top-ups in plastic pouches - or even take your dispenser to the store where it's filled by tap. I believe I have seen something like the top-up pouches, it should be strongly encouraged, with packaging taxes of some kind.
for your products you can either arrange to take them back, or you pay a tax according to what would it cost to recycle.
for electronics for example that can't be fully recycled or put on a landfill or burned because of dangerous materials that tax should be accordingly higher.
Seriously, did you truly "need" everything you purchased new and could you have gotten it second hand or forgone?
I already hear grumbling from the crowd, "opportuniy cost", "time", "but shiny!", etc.
That is the trade off for not feeding a system energy that is demostrably destroying everything of true value on this planet.
It's worth it.
The waste feel needlessly big because you touch and see it. But on a real level, your and mine personal trash does not matter.
¹ Open to seeing real numbers if they exist!
How do you ensure that they get properly sterilized/cleaned after every use?
How many years of life are you aiming at? What is your system for finding containers at the end of their life that may soon fail?
What weights are you aiming for. What strength are you aiming for. What about padding?
What price point are you aiming at for each container?
How easily removable is the ink? What happens if the ink gets removed in transit? Is the store allowed to re-ink that, or are they required to ship the package as damaged back to the manufacturer.
How do you ensure that the package has not been tampered with?
Given that this will result in extra bulk and weight compared to a custom designed package, (which we have now), how confident are you that this would end up being carbon neutral?
It seems like one of those things that sounds like a big deal, like recycling, but when you look into it, it’s actually not cost effective to address it except a few special cases.
On the other hand, waste is a literal side-effect of all possible life, going all the way to level of entropy always increasing. All life processes produce waste, even digital life would produce waste heat and whatever electricity generating process it consumes from can’t be 100% efficient.
I view modern packaging as a really amazing invention. People can mail me a fragile piece of art from across the world and it can reach me quickly and safely. Factories can massively produce safely sealed food items that prevent literally tons of food waste through packaging, increasing nutrition availability, water availability and more.
Most modern packaging is virtually a miracle.
Where I agree with you about packaging waste though is when it is used for branding and designed around aesthetic form or market testing rather than utility. Disposability is not a harmful goal at all, but waste generated purely to support branding is hard to defend.
Ban plastic containers and you’re halfway there.