> As a black person, I find this to be pretty racist. The idea that this will appease blacks or is wanted by us is deeply insulting.
White-dominated society deciding to stop casually reinforcing racist ideology and trying to figure out how to do that isn't about appeasing blacks or appealing to them on the level of atomic steps (I suppose the end goal of a society with less pervasive racism is something that probably appeals to most blacks—it certainly does to me personally, but I wasn't elected to speak for the whole race.)
> How disconnected from black experience can you be that you think this is important or desirable?
I think it's pretty racist for you to declare that my experience must not be black enough, as I find it not terribly important in and of itself or, out of context, desirable, but a part of a direction which is both important and desirable.
> It trivializes our very important concerns about police brutality and systematic racism.
I disagree that it does, and I think claiming that it does requires adopting a fallacious line of thought of the pattern “Doing X at all implies that doing X is all that is necessary or desirable”. Were I to adopt such a pattern, I would say that this:
> Do you want to fight against slavery? Then lets campaign to abolish the exception in the 13th amendment.
...likewise trivializes our very important concerns about police brutality and systematic racism, because while historically centrally important in the formation of racist structures in our modern society and economy, actual de jure penal involuntary servitude in the hole created by the 13th Amendment exception is a small and decreasing part of that in the present.
But that's silly, because attacking the 13th Amendment hole doesn't mean not attacking all the other problems.