China forces birth control on Uighurs to suppress population

There was nothing benevolent about the one-child policy. It was based on the idea that high birth rates were something for poor agrarians, but that the modern industrialized nation that China would become wouldn't need all those people and should in fact prevent them from being born to avoid overpopulation. Then when early efforts to promote voluntary birth control didn't drop the birth rate far enough, they added punitive fines, forced abortions and routine sterilizations to the toolbox.

The switch to the two-child policy was not due to a realization that all of that was unethical, but simply an adjustment of the target. Hence the simultaneous existence of programs promoting childbirth in regions below target, while people who have more children than planned are still punished harshly. It's all about staying on target.

>how long will the West wait until they take action?

I think most people in the west are simply ignorant of the situation.

I've been told by Taiwanese people living in the west that most westerners don't even know of Taiwan, or think it is Thailand.

Many western governments are addicted to Chinese money. The EU will never do anything concrete with regards to China since someone will probably veto.

Quite a few activist type people I know/knew (like the "occupy" anti-capitalist crowd) are pro-China, with a bunch of set talking points either justifying things the CCP did or calling it fake news.

I think "sinophobia" is on track to become the new "antisemitism", whereby it is a legitimate issue that quickly gets hijacked by nationalists who want to discredit anyone who criticizes Israel (or China).

I think we are passed the point where we can win a war against China without major causalities.

It's much cheaper and safer to (1) stop buying stuff from China to create economic unrest and (2) support forces that fight for a more free China.

(Purely hypothetical, I don't really condone any of this)

The justification for preemptive warfare was the security of Israel, not starting a war with a nuclear power.

And I'm sorry to make such a cynical point, but good luck selling a war to go save Muslim people to Western populations...

China's one child policy has created a massive cliff in their demography. A generation later, there aren't that many children to take over from and support their parents as they move out of the working population. While industrial capacity can be made up for a bit with automation, which china is investing heavily in, the common people will still see economic hardship. Further, the one child policy led to an extreme skewing of the sex ratio, which means large numbers of males will not be able to find partners in china. The wealthier ones will emigrate, taking their wealth with them, while the poorer ones will be left with nothing and no one to lose in a country whose interests become increasingly misaligned with theirs.

For the moment, large numbers of people still remember when china was weak, and from these ranks come the party leaders who staunchly defend and promote national unity. These people will die off in the not too distant future though, leaving people who never had to live through the bad times which justified the communist government's existence. Much like how the soviet union collapsed as soon as the tsarist age passed out of living memory, china will struggle to convince the disparate parts of china are stronger together as their growth slows and totalitarian policies become ever more divorced from real threats.

Unified chinese states have formed many times in history. They have also shattered many times. The actions in recent years of putting economic growth above all else, suppressing ethnic minorities in favor of a homogeneous Han state, and building up institutions for societal control are not the actions of a powerful emerging superpower but desperate ploys to stop history from repeating itself before it's too late. While perhaps they will succeed, at least for some time, I personally think the next few decades will not be kind to china.

America and the west would be better served making sure they don't succumb to similar problems. Europe likewise has an inverted population pyramid and the horrors of world war 2 which forged the west's present unity is likewise about to pass out of living memory. The west is at least much more open to immigration than China so it has less resistance on the path to fixing its demographic problems (despite the rise of recent alt-right/anti-immigration movements). Further, the west's unity formed from many organic interconnections of economic and military shared interest rather than being forced upon it by a central authority, so those bonds are presumably more resilient. That said, the west is much more indebted and its power much more overextended in places like the middle east and africa. Its challenges will be different in nature but similar in degree.

The world is likely to take a very surprising form in the not too distant future regardless of any attempts to shape it.

There is a serious problem with the constant lies coming out about the Uighurs. Cut up for organs is one that comes to mind.

So it is hard to see here what is actually going on around birth control in a country that for so long had a one child policy for everyone.

That said this issue dwarfs so many others, like BLM for instance, but the Uighurs gets close to no air time.

This is an ok Twitter feed with citizen investigations using satellite images

https://twitter.com/Nrg8000