Two Chinese Video Encoders
blog.sesse.net
blog.sesse.net
Lower model/older chipset $80 lan solution https://www.ebay.com/itm/H-265-H-264-HDMI-Video-Encoder-Vide...
$190 wifi one https://www.ebay.com/itm/Wireless-WIFI-Hi3516A1080p-60fps-En...
> GPL violations are rampant, of course. Both ship Linux with no license text (even though UHE265-1-Mini comes with a paper manual) and no source in sight. Both ship FFmpeg, although URayTech has configured it in LGPL mode, unlike LinkPi, which has a full-on GPL build and links to it from various proprietary libraries. (URayTech ships busybox; I don't think LinkPi does, but I could be mistaken.) LinkPi's FFmpeg build also includes FDK-AAC, which is GPL-incompatible, so the entire shebang is non-redistributable. So both are bad, but the ENC1 is definitely worse. I've sent a request to support for source code, but I have zero belief that I'll receive any.
Their IP system is strange in that you can file a patent in China even if there is prior art and is being used elsewhere in the world. This means you see interesting incidents - a patent we filed some years ago with apparently little to zero commercial value suddenly popped up in China, filed by some company from Shenzhen. It was apparently a word for word copy of what we had filed, and the diagrams were identical too.
Though there are tall claims about how IP protection has "improved" in China, they have a long way to go and a lot of broken trust to rebuild.