Cafferty's firing was wrong because his employer shouldn't have the right to fire him like that. But this is a harder position to defend when you're running conservative interference in an ostensibly liberal publication.
Cafferty's firing was wrong because his employer shouldn't have the right to fire him like that. But this is a harder position to defend when you're running conservative interference in an ostensibly liberal publication.
That is an excellent point. However, countries which do have political instruments that prevent workers from being disposable are not immune to this either.
This US-centric movement has resonated surprisingly strong in the media and social media in Germany, to the point that there were several protests which broke the rules designed to stem the pandemic. This wasn't by any means unique, as several countries in Western Europe were affected.
There's also a deep conflict running in German society between the left (which consider themselves the good guys) and the right (which are considered basically Nazis by the left). The definition of what it means to be right-wing is predictably expanding to encompass relatively minor gestures, comments or actions and the label of right-wing is then applied to more and more people. It is my impression that it's hard to fire someone for being right-wing though, since the courts have reversed such decisions, but there are social consequences. In general AfD voters are considered right-wing and terrible people. But on the other hand, the AfD enjoyed quite some success in the elections, so what does this tell us about German society?
It seems to me that there's a big disconnect between the media and intellectual elites and the average Joe (or Fritz). Furthermore, a society which is willing to ostracize a significant number of its own for holding specific opinions instead of working through its differences - like many Western European countries or the US wrongly do - is weakening itself. This is one of the paradoxes of this cancel culture: it's doing away with otherwise productive members of society for minor offenses which objectively do not cause harm. It's essentially a form of ideological cleansing.
I think it tells us that the fight against racism and fascism is perpetual, even in countries that otherwise have strong legal frameworks for combating them (as Germany does).
> Furthermore, a society which is willing to ostracize a significant number of its own for holding specific opinions instead of working through its differences - like many Western European countries or the US wrongly do - is weakening itself.
I think the idea of a country "weakening itself" is both a red herring and a dog whistle (although I don't know if you intended the latter). It wasn't very long ago that the US used state power to physically ostracize and divide its citizens by race and religion. That, for whatever reason, isn't considered an act of self-weakening, but (occasionally misdirected) observations on social media about the former are. That, to me, is telling.
The fight against racism is perpetual, fine. There are two camps in that fight, the racists and non-racists. The non-racists have decided to apply the unique strategy of removing people from their camp and adding them to the opposite camp: every time a non-racist says something not correct enough or God forbid even wrong (e.g. on twitter), they are ejected into the other camp. Eventually the other camp's grown from a fringe phenomenon to being noticeably large and everyone laments. In this perpetual fight, the non-racists and non-fascists have chosen a losing plan of action. Maybe they should reconsider instead of digging in their heels.
"It wasn't very long ago that the US used state power to physically ostracize and divide its citizens by race and religion. That, for whatever reason, isn't considered an act of self-weakening, but (occasionally misdirected) observations on social media about the former are. That, to me, is telling. "
I don't know why you think that it wasn't, but obviously it was a huge act of self-weakening and that besides the moral dimension is probably an important reason behind its rectification.