The Case Is Building That Covid-19 Had a Lab Origin
independentsciencenews.org
independentsciencenews.org
This article seems more level headed, and indeed acknowledges the problem.
Maybe its most frightening sentence is:
> US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is currently constructing a new and expanded national Bio and Agro-defense facility in Manhattan, Kansas. DHS has estimated that the 50-year risk (defined as having an economic impact of $9-50 billion) of a release from its lab at 70%.
That's .. not great odds.
Why this is the case is more mysterious. One plausible explanation from Bret Weinstein is that it makes the work of virologists look very dangerous; maybe even more dangerous then not studying viruses.
> (Zhou et al., 2020; Wrapp et al., 2020; Wan et al., 2020; Walls et al., 2020; Letko et al., 2020).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2507
https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20
"By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients were identified as laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection in Wuhan." - from the source cited by the article. Those are not "the first who had it", they were identified hospitalised cases. It is guesswork how many people were infected at the time, but assuming ~ 10^3 in Wuhan at January 2nd 2020 seems likely.
Remember: France had cases in December, as did Italy:
- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/04/french-hospita...
- https://smartwatermagazine.com/news/smart-water-magazine/stu...
But what is not discussed in detail is the following.
Western articles focus on the market as being a "wet market", but that's possibly the wrong emphasis.
There's 2 reasons to focus on just the "market" word:
1) As a major market, it's a high traffic area. SARS-1 is said to have come from a high-traffic market in 2002.
2) Apparently Wuhan residents don't eat bats, so those were unlikely to be in the market. That means the transmission is much more indirect than thought, and the source is even more likely to be the labs.
The terrifying thing is that one scientific summary paper discusses Gain of Function (GOF) research at those labs, which have poor isolation, and that the CCP wiped those labs. GOF is modifying corona to either attack more animals, or be more virulent. And here we are.
So no, another animal in between does not show explanation is more indirect then thought. It just shows something that was talked about openly in like January or February.
Those are all facts. Where is the fear-mongering?
Just because you don't know anything doesn't mean I don't.
How can you write this without suspicion? Did they interview all 11 million residents and all visitors and confirm? Why are bats sold if no one buys them?
Every single halfways respected virologist I've heard comment on this has said the lab leak theory is complete bonkers.
Millions of people come into contact with animals infected with coronaviruses every year. There are large populations of bats in the countryside that live in close proximity to humans and livestock, which act as permanent reservoirs for these viruses. In the countryside in China, there are places where 3% of the population (!) have been found to be seropositive for novel coronaviruses.
So while you worry about a few highly trained lab technicians wearing full protective suits and following decontamination procedures, there are millions of normal people wearing no protection coming into contact with these viruses every year.
> those labs, which have poor isolation
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is widely viewed as a world-class laboratory - one of a few elite labs that implement the highest safety protocols. The lab was designed in partnership with France's top BSL-4 lab, and its staff is trained at the premiere US BSL-4 lab, in Galveston.