From my experience as a US government-adjacent worker, there are a few agencies that are really working hard to drag the govt into the present. The General Service Administration's digital efforts (login.gov, Digital Strategy, etc.) are fighting inertia to try to modernize the gov't. Additionally, the public research being done at NASA/NIH/other labs requires a lot of infrastructure—and that's spilling over into other labs and agencies.

However, it's all fighting the insane bureaucratic system that requires mountains of paperwork to do anything, as well as requirements to contract out jobs to expensive and shitty contractors.

This has nothing to do with any administration, governments move slow. They have a lot of internal special interests (and I'm not talking about contractors) that fight to keep the status quo, largely because change can lead to people's jobs becoming irrelevant, etc. Then there are heaps of channels and regulations you have to go through to get anything done, even if you are an independent agency. Anyone that has worked in a large corporation or government knows how it works. The bigger is it is, the harder it is to implement change...even if it is the most basic change imaginable. This is one reason I currently would rather work for smaller companies where my voice can be heard and changes are more agile. Granted if a big tech giant like Microsoft offered me a job, I wouldn't decline...but some other corporations/government, especially old media companies, are like trying to roll a boulder up a muddy hill in terms of getting anything done; and I'd want nothing to do with it.

Just 5 years?