It's funny how you can read just that and know that the bill is going to be absurdly bad. Not even just bad in the philosophical/political sense but actually just bad as in not understanding the problem space, or not even formulated clearly or coherently.
There's plenty of D's who just love to come up with bills that make citizens more vulnerable to the government.
Sometimes I think the USA should have it's own history A/B compared against it's own history as recorded by the rest of the world.
Not saying it's Tiananmen level yet, but it seems some people haven't read their own history.
Disclaimer: I live in NSW, Australia. Some evil stuff happened here that is rarely acknowledged.
It's harder to fit that crap into something short and sweet enough for history textbooks so you don't hear about it whereas simple skin tone based discrimination in the south is easy to make a bullet point out of so everyone knows about it.
...and the rest of the states...
(Just saw an opportunity for a joke and took it)
If your voting base prefers the blood of christ over a facemask to protect from coronavirus, you probably aren't writing bills based on, uh, informed analysis of relevant data.
I same ways, I prefer the Republican approach because they're more honest about how they want to screw you so it's easier argue and fight back against.
She votes according to Trump’s recommendations more than any other democrat, and more than many republicans.
Her history of supporting right wing causes and overt corruption spans many decades.
As a California Democrat, her position has been unassailable most of her career. I suspect getting rid of her was a motivation for open primaries.
Californians, please stop voting for her!
Yes. I call her Senator Hollywood. That's the only constituency she really represents. She's been on the wrong side of all tech related bills over her entire career. EARN-IT is simply the latest one in that list.