How can we overcome that? https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/
Reading through https://blacklivesmatter.com/ pages, I am truly shocked. I don't think any of my colleagues who support this organisation agree even with a quater of BLM stances. How did this happen?
The name they chose is so strategically well chosen, but it can't be bullet proof, what can we do?
Throwing negative labels like “identity politics“ around kind of denies that the whole problem is that we as a nation are treating one set of people unfairly because of their identity. So yes, it’s “identity politics.”
I hope I come across as reasoning. I’m not going to throw names your way. As respectfully as I can be toward you and your ideas, I am not seeing a lot of substance to your argument. The argument seems “controversial opinion here, I don’t like this, and I won’t explain why.”
There will be no end to these problems until we recognise the problem is not in the colour of the skin. It's not one set of people, it's not even multiple sets of people (women/black people/latinos), it's not about heterogeneous sets of people (mixed-race). The problem is only within individuals, and their individual actions. If a black person kills another black person, that's bad. If a white person kills a black person, that's also bad. If a man kills a woman, that's bad. If a woman kills a man, that's bad. It looks like this is a difficult thing to accept nowadays.
Also I'm sorry if I haven't addressed all your points, I'm afraid I am busy and didn't have more time to develop this comment further.
If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
> If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
I mean, I'm anxious about all _impossible_ things making incursions on to this reality, but boy, you seem very favorable towards ideas you describe as stupid (I'm less convinced defunding is stupid, but abolishing police, that's not for me).
It is possible I am wrong, but as much as I informed myself, for this moment, my opinion is just different from the one proposed by BLM.
> If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
And that is what I am talking about. It seems to me that you think that all BLM demands are universally good - and if I don't fully agree with them I must be somehow a bad person. I refuse to believe that they have monopoly for morality and truth.
Middle-class is an important economic segment of the population but it really seems like protecting the middle class was always more important than growing the middle class.
Economics and statistics are hard and I’m forgiving for the protestors making some illogical demands which may feel right but would have unforeseen consequences. But there must be a compromise here. We all can’t just continue to pretend that things are great and BLM wants to disrupt that just cause.
I’m almost 40 and progress has been agonizingly slow. I argue that the counterpoints which I hear or read against BLM are really just good old fashioned conservatism masquerading as logical rigour.
I can’t stop the Federalist Society from existing just because I disagree with their views.
From what I can tell, BLM is doing nothing illegal: it’s not encouraging or hate or violence.
Personally, I don’t see anything extreme about the “what we believe” page. I would agree with most if not all of it. If you don’t like that, and if you don’t like that, legitimately, a lot of people actually do agree with those beliefs, there’s nothing you can do about it.
Pieces of advice from me:
1. If you are going to point out that the BLM organization is unfavorable to you, you should clearly separate the organization from the phrase. Black lives do indeed matter and many people who use the phrase aren’t necessarily part of the organization. I hope that idea is rather obvious. You can’t change the fact that this organization’s name and branding is extremely effective like that.
2. Have well-informed reasons on why the organization itself is problematic. This post in particular doesn’t have any information besides a link and a statement that you don’t like it. So what exactly has the organization done wrong in your view? Are they corrupt or shady in some way or do you just disagree with their ideals? If you are well reasoned and empathetic you won’t be accused of being racist. If you’re being contrarian just because something makes you uncomfortable that’s a sign that maybe your own argument is mostly based on bias.
3. Evaluate if it’s even worth your time and energy just to disagree with someone else. What does that get you? Meeting on common ground is how people communicate successfully, nobody got anywhere by telling the other person they’re wrong.
4. I would encourage you to re-evaluate what freedom and liberty mean to you if your aim is to defeat other people’s ideologies for the sake of dislike or disagreement alone. People have the right to believe in the ideology of the BLM organization.
What I think is worth 'overcoming' is a sentiment that if one disagrees with the goals of blacklivesmatter organisation it shouldn't mean he/she is racist, insensitive etc.
I work for a company from USA and I have been 'outed' for not sharing black lives matter hashtag and whatnot, I don't feel I can safely say that I disagree with some points - I talked to handful of people privately and I met with literal outrage. I think this is really problematic.
Truthfully, I don’t spot any logical way to disagree with those stated views without the reasoning being “I don’t like that kind of person.”
I can only assume that you did a lot more than “not sharing” at work. In fact you said so - you went out of your way to talk to people in private just to disagree. People don’t like that kind of thing, doesn’t matter what the subject matter is.