>Do you know how China powers their much larger smelters?
Looks like largely coal. [1] This surprises me, as China has some truly massive hydroelectric generation stations which would be ideal for smelting.
>And do you know if these possible difference in aluminum smelting is considered when the carbon footprint for something like a mostly-aluminum Tesla is made?
I'm sure it's considered, but really don't know more than that. There is a big push in the manufacturing field to get ISO 14001 (environmental) certification. Many large manufacturers are requiring that of their suppliers. I'm unfamiliar how well the certification would allow tracing back emissions. Even if there were a higher carbon footprint on production, some of that can be cancelled out by better energy efficiency of the vehicles. The cost per pound and cost of repairs can be higher on aluminum.
Tesla, in its push to be economical, appears to be going with steel on the Model 3 (compared to aluminum on Model S).
>Chowdhry highlighted the key advantages of steel over aluminum as being the lower production equipment costs, the lower worker training/skill needed to work/operate steel, the lower compensation and cost savings of steel workers versus aluminum workers, and the lower repair costs. [2]
We've seen significant increases in aluminum per vehicle [3], though much slower than estimates from 40 years ago would have said. The CAFE standards implemented in the Obama era seemed to kick things into gear, notably with the Ford F-150 switching much if not all of its body to aluminum.
[1] http://www.world-aluminium.org/statistics/primary-aluminium-...
[2] https://evannex.com/blogs/news/112953413-tesla-model-s-vs-te...
[3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/496185/pounds-of-aluminu...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_average_fuel_economy