The real threat in this case was that sending the right string of data to a browser let a malicious actor execute a RCE and install malware. Either you trust the browser to be secure against such attacks or you can't trust much of anything.
The real threat in this case was that sending the right string of data to a browser let a malicious actor execute a RCE and install malware. Either you trust the browser to be secure against such attacks or you can't trust much of anything.
This seems a lot more complicated than just going to any unencrypted website via network redirection of some sort. Do most people routinely visit encrypted sites that are easily hacked to target an RCE on an individual?
If someone were to be "secure enough" to be running drugs/guns/children - they'd _have_ to be totally disconnected from the internet and cellular networks, and probably all their first and second level associates as well.
I don't have any sympathy for those people, but sadly a journalist critical of a government has all the same problems there, and that's bad for humanity.