Y Combinator’s Newest Start-Ups Riding High On Demo Day
blogs.wsj.com
blogs.wsj.com
I don't care how good a crop of candidates YC attracts - that type of pre-money valuation can't be for any _particular_ startup, rationally supported in just 90 days of work with a small team.
The following possibilities come to mind:
A) The investor who was not named was pulling numbers
out of their ass and couldn't back them up.
B) The current crop has been working on their ideas for
a lot longer than 90 days
C) We've reached a bubble in valuations.
D) There is an expectation of at least one multi-billion
dollar hit that will make up for the losses on the
other 40 or so misses.
E) I'm wrong, and the current batch of YC start-ups
truly do deserve $10 Million pre-money valuations.Also, many companies are raising at lower valuations.
Another way of saying this, is that these types of investments are clearly _not_ for the conservative investor who can only afford to invest in one company.
In fact, the only bold text on my blog post about startup investing says exactly the opposite of that: http://paulbuchheit.blogspot.com/2011/01/angel-investing-my-...
Second, Paul Buchheit is investing in some of the YC companies in addition to his participation as a partner? Will that create signaling issues? I know he knows the YC companies better than other startups, but if he doesn't invest, it means he passed? Same thing happened with VC's doing angel rounds then if they don't follow up, they're leaving the startup in the lurch?