https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
There's are 2.8GHz processors at the top of that benchmark with a 3100 score and one near the bottom with a 539 score, as well as everywhere in between.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
There's are 2.8GHz processors at the top of that benchmark with a 3100 score and one near the bottom with a 539 score, as well as everywhere in between.
My dad uses a computer with C2Q CPU and it's still fast enough for everyday use.
Edit: to be clear, he's still wrong, we had quite untrivial IPC increase during all these years. I just wanted to point out that he's comment probably was based on empirical data.
I've got a 13 year old laptop that runs today's OS's and development software a little slow but ultimately just fine, and if it weren't for a low limit on installed RAM it would be more than "ultimately" just fine.
That would've been absolutely laughable even 10 years ago, much less 20. You'd be lucky to be able to run a then-current OS on 2-3 year old hardware in the 90's through early 2000's.
Some years later I got a 486. The difference was night and day.
Some years later I got a Pentium 150. The difference was night and day.
Some years later I got a Pentium III. The difference was night and day.
Some five years ago I had a i7 2600k. I now got a Ryzen 3800x. Is it faster? Yes. Is it night and day? For what I do every day, no.