Startup vs. Company
spencerfry.com
spencerfry.com
"a startup is a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scalable business model."
source: http://steveblank.com/2011/03/18/new-rules-for-the-new-bubbl...
Related question: Can you have a startup within a non-startup?
He didn't just throw it out there, he quizzed the students with intense questions for an hour about what they thought startups were, like they were in law school and had a prof obsessed with the Socratic Method. It was surprisingly hard to define what a startup was and dovetails with the themes floating around HN lately.
thx
It is possible to "have been around for five years, generate millions in revenue, and have fifty employees" and still be in the startup stage, especially if your vision is to generate billions and have thousands of employees; conversely, some businesses in an Advanced Growth stage would not have those numbers (except, probably, the time in business).
To take those differences into account, our Stages framework relies on the changing feelings that occur within an organisation, rather than things like turnover and profit (which are easily compared, but not necessarily comparable). Loosely, I define a business as moving out of Startup when it begins to 'invest with confidence' rather than 'investing with hope'.
That business you have in the garage making no money? You're probably investing your time and some cash with the hope it will succeed. Google? They're investing with confidence, because they've demonstrated their business model. Twitter? Is a good question - are they feeling hopeful and frantic, or confident?
If you get valley funding from super angels who know the IPO market is dead and their most likely exit is strategic acquisition, then creating product, growth and becoming a credible threat or opportunity is key.
If you are self funded or raise money from your biz school professor or an angel who built a profitable business, then your focus is going to be on building what the author calls a "company".
The nature of funding in the NE vs the Valley has a huge impact on the kinds of businesses that are built there.
Outside the States the difference in approach is startling - in most countries funding is never an option. Most business is designed to provide a living wage and "failing fast" is not a mantra because it means starving quickly.
This is my own definition. I've been following this scene for a number of years. Seen a lot of half ass efforts calling themselves startups. Look, I've had countless side projects, have started multiple companies, and have been self employed for over 5 years - but never have I launched a "startup". Because I don't take this concept lightly.
When I launch a startup - you'll know about it - and you can bet your ass it's not some part time gig. A startup is a full time commitment, no exceptions.
>>they were currently working on a half dozen startups (what I'd term "projects"; a startup needs focused development)
What? I have never seen this. This could just be a NYC/SF thing( as the author points out )but outside those zones, I can't imagine this to be even remotely true. Nerd groupies? Ha.
To quote Ballmer's character in Pirates of Silicon Valley, "..they were moaning, 'oh, computer language, Oh Fortran! OH FORTRAN, OOOHHHHH!'"
As far as social cred---we don't get as much as doctors since we don't save lives, but we have at least as much as lawyers.
It's not a Bay Area thing -- unwarranted extrapolation. :-)
The problem seems industry-wide: I hear people (from all over the place) say "hey, look at my startup!" and point to a small Django app with no business plan or even a business concept, one "founder", and no indication whether that founder intends to stick with it and develop into a company.
Projects are not startups. A startup is, as Steve Blank says, a (small) organization that intends to develop itself into a company. A Rails app is not automatically a "startup".