Hacker News Reader

Comment by rallison | Hacker News Reader

It's also possible many of these colleagues had concerns, but weren't previously airing them publicly.

Just searching academics I follow, the one thread that popped up from a year ago was this https://twitter.com/Graham_Coop/status/1132105378668326912

In which it seems many of these criticisms were well known at least a year ago. I hadn't previously followed this, but it seems like this was probably a case of the dam finally bursting.

View on HN

This is definitely the case of the dam finally bursting. For example, a famous geneticist who left said this: https://twitter.com/ctitusbrown/status/1271082397656735746?s...

I also have friends on the faculty. This is the dam bursting and should have happened a long time ago.

The person with #shutdownSTEM in their twitter profile pic?

#shutdownSTEM was a wildly popular strike day recently, I think they can be excused from not changing it back yet.

On what planet should “shutdown STEM” be a reasonable position to hold in the middle of a global pandemic where hundreds of thousands or millions of people’s lives depend on quality STEM research being done in a timely manner?

Spending one day to learn to restructure STEM to increase its innovation and output is of the utmost reasonableness.

If you are not a scientist and did not bother to find out what the day was about, why are you prejudging it?

The hashtag is not #RestructureSTEM, it’s #ShutdownSTEM, and he’s apparently had it up for 11 days. In a pandemic killing hundreds of thousands, in all likelihood eventually millions, of people. In my view, that says all I need to know about this person. He’s a raging asshole.

This is the same problem, by the way, as the people tweeting #DefundPolice who get upset at people who think they want to abolish the police entirely. The word “defund” means to remove funding for, not to reduce funding for. It’s the height of arrogance to come up with a slogan either intentionally or accidentally using a word to mean something totally different from what it actually means, and then get upset that I am not willing to learn more about a movement that is effectively engaged in trolling.

You do not know what the hashtag means, have not bothered to research it, are ignoring somebody telling you what it means. Instead, from a few small characters you are extrapolating a bunch of nonsense that fits your own narrative, rather than seeking the truth.

I do not believe that there can be any productive conversation unless you decide to seek truth instead of seeking validation of your preconceived notions.

Is there an actual example of what was said? Otherwise this is just another empty accusation.

I don’t know anything about the specific dynamics of the problem — so perhaps you’re right. But I have a general problem with the catalyst to being removed being a twitter mob. Whether it should have happened long ago, was deserved, or not.

If people should be fired or removed from a position that’s fine, I don’t know Hsu beyond his blog. But this is a method that is dangerous to societal function.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com