Hey is currently only for individuals, there is no free option, every user must pay.
(I'm not defending Apple taking a cut of subscriptions. Just pointing out a difference.)
Which, from a consumer point of view I appreciate it. I like Apple subscriptions.
However, for the businesses selling the 30% cut is hard to stomach.
Netflix doesn't.
Hey is trying to do just exact same thing but surfing on the verbosity and not business power per se.
A smaller business or an individual has no option but to get screwed by apple because they have no power.
Shouldn't we be fighting for a level playing field?
Big companies such as Netflix, Disney etc. are drivers, they have impact on the user base. If Netflix stopped working on Apple's devices we would see huge outflow of users.
Hey on the other hand is a passenger. Sure, they might have 50k users in the queue, but them not being on Apple's platforms will probably shrink this number significantly. It's unlikely that Android users will switch to Apple because of the Hey experience.
From that it boils down to personal views. If one thinks that driver should have the same amount of power as passenger this scenario is upsetting.
Yet this is not universal view and I'd argue that the opposite view is the "norm". We have celebrities who can get more while spending less, specialists in the fields who have a lot of bonuses average Joe doesn't and well known businesspeople who have access to business which are out of reach. Do you imagine having 1.8b$ debt ? And yet Donald Trump was in that position long before he became POTUS.
Hey is exercising the same stuff. They want to become celebrity to slide. They don't fight for the change of rules. They fight for Hey to be approved.
This seems to be an unspoken policy change. I'm joining the outrage bandwagon now.
> What's infuriating is Apple's inconsistency. Some apps offer subscriptions outside of the app store and are still there (including Basecamp!)
That doesn't violate guidelines. Unless your app takes users outside of the app store to purchase stuff(including the subscription itself) without in app purchases.
Having an app requiring login is ok. It doesn't matter that the login is protecting a paid service.
Where did Hey take users outside of the app?
> 3.1.1 In-App Purchase:
If you want to unlock features or functionality within your app, (by way of example: subscriptions, in-game currencies, game levels, access to premium content, or unlocking a full version), you must use in-app purchase. Apps may not use their own mechanisms to unlock content or functionality, such as license keys, augmented reality markers, QR codes, etc. Apps and their metadata may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase.”3.1.3(a) “Reader” Apps: Apps may allow a user to access previously purchased content or content subscriptions (specifically: magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video, access to professional databases, VoIP, cloud storage, and approved services such as classroom management apps), provided that you agree not to directly or indirectly target iOS users to use a purchasing method other than in-app purchase, and your general communications about other purchasing methods are not designed to discourage use of in-app purchase.”
Looks like for example Netflix app does even show a link to their registration page. You can only login to existing account.
I don't have one to test it though.
Hey doesn't do this and DHH was very explicit in the many steps they took not to step on this rule.