If we don't have a free market, it doesn't do much good to say the free market will solve any of our problems.
Huh? Presumably the suggestion is to make the market freer.
Or perhaps to acknowledge that the assumptions about a free-market ignore the realities of human psychology, and thus a free-market inherently cannot exist because humans are not capable of producing a free market without regulation, and regulation is antithetical to a truly free market?