Amazon’s Android App Store Launches: Test Drive Apps Directly From Your Browser
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
How does any of this relate to the actual app? Someone should be reading these reviews and deleting them, because developers don't want reviews that have nothing to do with ther app making their 5-star app a 3-star app.
Remind me to never give anyone anything for free. They will just whine about it. Better to charge them $10,000 for the app, then charge them for a $500/hour consultant to work around the bugs. They'll whine about it, but then I would be able to afford enough alcohol to not care.
(And no, I have no Android apps. But I just can't get excited about writing one when I see how dumb the average user is.)
3.a. Delivery Commitment for Apps. You will deliver electronically to us (and continue to make available during the Term all versions of all software applications, games or other digital products (including any special or collector’s editions) (i) that are designed for the Platform, (ii) for which you have the rights required under this Agreement, and (iii) that are the same versions and editions (except as otherwise provided in this Agreement) that you or your affiliates make available directly or indirectly to any Similar Service.
Does this mean that if I distribute one of my applications through the Appstore, I'm legally required to distribute all of my applications that way?
If so, no thanks. I'm perfectly happy to distribute one app through Amazon's store as an experiment, but there's no way I'm going to sign an open-ended agreement to distribute everything at prices set by Amazon.
If they want every app I write, they would need to earn that through good sales and a lack of shenanigans.
It would appear that they intend to discount apps heavily, to try to get traction. Which is fine for something intended by the developer as a loss leader, but could really bite hard if applied to premium versions. But of course, they insist on access to the premium versions, if you want to use 'em to sell the loss leaders.
[1] http://207-171-168-158.amazon.com/kdpforums/entry.jspa?categ...
That's not (quite) what it looks like to me: I think clause (iii) is just saying that you can't list an app on a competing service unless you list the same version on Amazon's app store. Effectively, it seems they get to sell any app that you want to sell on another app store -- but they're not asserting rights over all future Android apps you might write.
(This raises a question I don't know the answer to: is it possible to distribute Android applications without an app store, in the style of "download this bundle from our site and transfer it to your phone"? Or do the non-developer versions of Android out there require that apps be signed by a central authority before they'll execute them?)
This actually makes me want to try Android (I am an iPhone user)! But I don't live in the States, so… whatever, at least I can fire up a VPN and give those apps a go.
Also, (mostly important if you're not on a Mac) you don't have to use iTunes!
Sometimes i wish we were back in 1998 where the Internet was the same everywhere. :(
• Amazon Appstore is only available to customers located in the United States
So I guess you're right :(The part where I said the Amazon App Store's Test Drive feature was innovative? Or something else?
I just downloaded the Amazon store on my Nexus One and started downloading Angry Birds Rio. The first thing I noticed is that, while downloading, there's no ongoing notification like the Android Market has. If I navigate away from the Amazon Appstore there's no indication I'm still downloading anything at all. There was also no notification when it finished downloading; I had to manually re-open the Amazon Appstore, then it gave me the standard "installing an app" screen.
Even though I have the Amazon Kindle app installed and syncing, Amazon hasn't set up an entry in the Android "Accounts" list, as the official Twitter and Facebook apps have.
Also, the "menu" widgets are non-standard. This may seem like a minor quibble, but it just adds to the "We're Amazon, we do things our own way" vibe I'm getting.
I still plan on occasionally using the Amazon Appstore, and I can't speak to the "test apps in your browser" functionality yet, but I can't see it replacing the Android Market long-term.
I can't see how Google or the EFF would be pleased about it if it's for analytics.
Not being able to use them offline would suck though.
Do any people with better droid-fu know if it always has to be this way? Will future version of the Android App Store be able to have a more seemless install process?
It also isn't a case of enabling unsigned applications (I believe all applications still require a developer signature), but a case of enabling installs from somewhere besides the google android market. Google won't let other "app store" type apps on the android market on purpose, so it is unlikely that the rules will be relaxed or changed unless they have a philosophical/competitive change of heart.
And I think it's the way it should be. Google needs to concentrate on the platform, let Amazon and their expertise in ecommerce handle this part.
On the other hand, Google has been slow on improving the Android Market -- interface doesn't allow discovery of noteworthy apps and I can't sell apps from my country yet.
(from Ireland)