https://bwab.com/surface-rights-vs-mineral-rights-whats-the-...
You might be right. But based on the information in the article, it might also be true that tourists don't ever notice that any of this happened.
But basically, almost nobody is willing to even go to this land even if they did own it. Even environmental charities would probably set their sights elsewhere: jungles and waterways are almost certainly more environmentally significant.
It often turns out to be more complicated, because most of the land in the United States is stolen land. In the Hawaiian Kingdom, King Kamehameha III "invented" private property because the kingdom was starting to open up to the global world and he wanted to make sure the lands which the people occupied could not be stolen by way of foreign military invasion. Which is impressive considering that a foreign military invasion did indeed come, and those lands could not legally be seized by the invading forces. The land would need to be stolen by other means. Up until then, land was not property it was a responsibility, to the family, the community, and by extension, the nation as a whole. Land could not be owned, only stewarded. Land could not be sold for profit. A friend of mine put it nicely, he said that, to him, the buying and selling of land is like prostituting a family member, who is also an elder.
It just doesnt make sense, so try not to think about it. You get too many people thinking about it at the same time, the whole system is liable to fall apart.
But it's especially not a problem here because desert land in America is extremely plentiful and unwanted. It's effectively an unlimited resource. Do you know of any native Americans who want to use some remote desert but can't because they don't own it? Give them $2 to lease some. The government won't use it any more than they're already not using it so it's no use in their hands. They've already blasted big areas of desert with nuclear bombs and left it permanently radioactive so it's not even clear that the government is a good steward of land anyway.
No, that’s not at all what this process does. It provides limited mineral rights for the land. That is all. No surface rights and definitely not exclusive rights to the land.