Exactly, Nadim Kobeissi's name is the last one I expected to see on a crypto audit that someone would pay for. Internet never completely forgets, but in practice a little with your head down and your past sins wash out.
I would confidently guess that's way more legitimate that any opinion you could formulate against this audit, based on ad hominem attacks.
This was not "ECDH completely broken" bad, by far, but still far from good. I guess that was still before obtaining his PhD.
And about not liking the guy, I'll admit reading https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14868600/todd-v-reichwe... biased me...