Uh, what? It’s changing the UI to hide parts of the URL.
Look, I’d prefer it the other way too, but we have to choose the right words. The thought process shouldn’t be “I’m mad, what else makes me really mad like this? Oh yeah social justice workers. This UI change is therefore like social justice work.”
EDIT: I was clearly disagreeing with the parent badmouthing SJWs wrt accessibility...
It feels like someone printed out a website to a PDF and decided that was good enough to serve!
"Pushing for accessibility" is a pejorative now? What in the world is going on in this thread?
The parent's point is that someone who would self-identify or otherwise be described as SWJ would more likely push for greater accessibility to a fault rather than reduce it for aesthetic reasons. The attack on “SJWs” in the grandparent is misguided because it misunderstands their motivations so completely that it’s clear that the term is just meant as “people I vaguely don’t like and I feel have it out for me somehow.”