Hacker News Reader

Suppose Zoom exits China (1.39B potential users) in response. This would almost certainly constitute a breach of fiduciary duty.

Censorship is legal. Failing to act in the best interest of shareholders is not.

Perhaps legislators should stick to writing laws?

>This would almost certainly constitute a breach of fiduciary duty.

Would it? I'm not sure simply operating in a big market or not operating it would qualify as 'breach of fiduciary duty'.