I would urge you to reconsider your stance on this as "a PR issue". Having readily available realtime aerial imaging data involves numerous ethical and safety concerns. Stating that people who have these ethical concerns are "few" and that you would "like to brush them off" shows a lack of consideration for how your technology could negatively impact others. Based on a recent paper [1] , "the results show that Europe is 83.28 percent covered with an average of one aerial photography every half an hour and a ground sampling distance of 0.96 meters per pixel".

Assuming 30m intervals and a 1m GSD I can know when someone is or isn't home based on whether or not a car is in their driveway. For people living in the vicinity of an airport where the GSD and intervals would presumably be much higher I could track individuals to and from their home or office from the comfort of a coffee shop.

Either of the above capabilities has ramifications for things like:

- stalking and harassment (no need to follow someone physically)

- home invasion and theft (can determine when someone is out of the house)

- targeting of dissidents (can track who showed up at a meeting)

- kidnapping and rendition (can know when someone is isolated without committing physical surveillance resources)

Those are just a few of the things I can come up with off the top of my head.

Even if you limit your tools to governments and businesses what prevents illegitimate organizations from using shell companies [2] or other means for establishing legitimate accounts to your services, and what prevents individuals within legitimate organizations from accessing the tools for personal means? [3]

Calling this a "PR issue" grossly understates the potential damage a technology like this can cause in the wrong hands.

[1] "Aerial Imagery Based on Commercial Flights as Remote Sensing Platform" 03/2020 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339988238_Aerial_Im...

[2] https://money.cnn.com/2015/12/09/news/shell-companies-crime/...

[3] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-surveil-lance-watchdo...

*edited for formatting