Hacker News Reader

Comment by planck01 | Hacker News Reader

And...back to AMD?

It says "for personal reasons," which is not text I would expect if he was just going to another company.

He could have had a falling out with Intel losing their edge

These things are in development for many years before they hit silicon, I don't think his time at intel has been long enough for that to be true. More likely, IMO, is that the same bureaucracy that lead to intel falling behind drives people like Keller away.

If scaling pipelines is hard, scaling pipeline pipelines is harder.

Accountant management. Current CEO came up thru finance. Knows how to hold a dividend steady but not a wafer.

He was probably there specifically to help Intel regain that edge. But he may not have received enough support to implement his vision, or simply he had a personal reason to leave.

I would say that actually this is the time where you can have more freedom to get things done and be able take bigger risks.

Intel has to change something to catch up with AMD. So I imagine the 'play safe' people have less power now.

Also, he's agreed to stay on as a consultant for the next six months, which I assume is not something you'd do if you were planning on working for a competitor at the same time.

6 months is not an atypical non-compete clause length.

I obviously haven't seen his contract but it would surprise me if the noncompete clock started before his final day as a consultant. If it did, that would sort of eliminate the value of having a noncompete in the first place, wouldn't it?

I left a company with a noncompete in place (it was largely valid) and did consulting work for them. The two relationships are completely separate. As a full time employee, I had signed the noncompete. As soon as my full time employment ended, the term of the noncompete began counting down. My later relationship with the company was completely separate, with its own contract (which I ensured had no non-compete clauses).

I could easily see similar happening for Jim, here. The full time role has expired, and there is a new, separate contract for consulting work.

I've done similar things in the past, but my value to those companies' competitors was much lower than Keller's would be, presumably, to someone like AMD vis-a-vis internal problems and short-term strategic thinking. The importance of enforcing a noncompete and accompanying garden leave increases pretty linearly with how senior you are in your industry, in my experience.

Either way, I imagine we'll find out soon enough.

When someone really has personal reasons, they usually "take a sabbatical" or are "off on sick leave".

For this kind of person, Intel gains a lot simply having his name associated with the company, so would have no qualms giving him years to travel the world on a yacht if he wanted to.

I think it really means "Intel didn't fire me, but I don't want to say any more".

I've personally known people who leave with that line and surface at a new company shortly thereafter.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com