If seeking validation is the prime motivation to contribute to a discussion, at the very least I think HN is the least guilty of this amongst most forums.
In programming, at least the code needs to work. Maybe it is a bad pattern or anything - but the barrier of entry is non-trivial. For anything else (e.g. politics), a lot of people have opinions, with their strength being not much correlated with their knowledge of the subject.
Looking back, it seems Feburary/March/April covid-19 experts' expertise had the same (or worse) predictive power as random programmers on HN.
Please tell me you did this on purpose.
https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/03/technology/suddenly-every...
https://web.archive.org/web/20181018000000/https://www.nytim...
There was also a strong politics subreddit full of group-think but that wasn't what most people went there for I'd say. It was one of three subreddits if i recall.
The site definitely changed when users could create their own subreddits as that opened the board to just about every kind of person or group on the internet.
I believe sites would do best to specialize even at the cost of growth. I'm happy when hackernews sticks mostly to tech and doesn't silo us into specialized and moderated subreddits.
We're also all driven to correct the things we see that aren't quite right.
This comment has been a little of column A and a little of column B.
It's a standard disclaimer because giving legal advice without being licensed to practice law is a crime in many jurisdictions.
So less about being validated for our experience, more about trying to avoid being dragged into court/relied on for evidence in a future court case.
No, in all seriousness I think this is one true factor. But I feel like this isn’t a bad thing on its own. The issue arises when authors don’t disclose their knowledge or competence. Saying stuff like: this is what I assume, this us what I don’t know etc. or just posing plain questions.
There's another dimension to this too, which is that writing blog posts and coming off as knowledgeable can directly translate into career opportunities. As long as you aren't too wrong, there's a material incentive to putting stuff out there.
There is certainly value in that, also from a self-promotional perspective.
Also have you seen a job posting for an entry level software engineering position? You have to say you’re knowledgeable about everything on the application or you will get filtered out in the first round. Publishing blog posts is the easiest way to come across as knowledgeable about a new tech.
The combination of the two facets is much more useful than either alone.
I think IANAL is a popular term on HN because HN originated in a country with a terribly litigious culture, and because HN is primarily populated by people who can at least afford lawyers.
If I'd "talk to a lawyer" as often as HN comments recommend people do then I'd have no money (or time) left to eat. The whole thing is about covering your ass.
I suppose that is validation in a way, but not to feed my ego.
In some places, throwing out opinions to stimulate discussion is perfectly reasonable. In others, it's simply noise and misinformation.