Hacker News Reader

Comment by siberianbear | Hacker News Reader

Google Docs isn't a great example. In WordPerfect's case, WordPerfect was the product and there was an incentive to make it great.

Google Docs isn't the product. It's free. You're the product. And it only needs to be good enough to keep competitors from creating something so great that it removes their first-mover advantage. It's clear that Google has given up developing new features for it.

View on HN

A solid portion of Docs users are paid G Suite users.

One of the nice things about GSuite (for me) is that it implements a nice spectrum of features that many people need without a lot of other stuff. I certainly get that some people need that other stuff whether sophisticated revision tracking, pivot tables, etc. But for my regular but generally unsophisticated use of GSuite, it's better than anything I've used in years.

[ADDED: And as other have mentioned while the collaborative editing of Google Docs doesn't scale all that well, it's a great remote collaboration tool. Never want to go back to sending docs around.]

I actually never much cared for WordPerfect with all its formatting codes and so forth. I was actually a bigger fan of early DOS-based Microsoft Word at the time.

Grammar checking on Google docs had gotten wicked smart.

I can only remember a single time the bad grammar marker on google docs wasn't hilariously wrong, contorting a perfectly normal sentence into something weird. And that one time it was catching a doubled word.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com