Hacker News Reader

I had copied the title from the article at the time of posting, that's literally the title if you search Google:

https://i.imgur.com/Xwheqan.png

Ah, well, I guess business insider is to blame then. The way this title is written initially gave me the very strong impression that change.org has deceived people by pretending to collect donations for one purpose and then keeping them for itself. But in reality the story is people are so dumb they will click to donate $3 without paying any attention to a sentence or two describing what the donation is for -- and then get mad when they find out later.

I don’t think people are dumb, the language is clearly structured so that it is ambiguous to take advantage of people who care about a cause.

Seems to say the same thing albeit truncated; there is a char limit.

"Change.org doesn't donate the money raised through its record-breaking George Floyd petition — and some donors say they feel misled"

What exactly is incorrect?