[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189189/ [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308600/#:~:tex....
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189189/ [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308600/#:~:tex....
I saw a statistic/study from China that found that only 1 in 7000 cases were exposed outdoors. The link could be as simple as people who spend a lot of time indoors get more exposure to the virus.
The only real action you can glean from that isn't to take supplements, it's don't do what caused those people to be vitamin D deficient which is usually staying indoors.
Maybe it's the vitamin D, maybe it isn't.
1. Vitamin D as a side effect of sun exposure is not itself the important indicator. Instead, some other biological response increases immune response simultaneously. Hence, D supplementation is itself copying the wrong response.
2. Vitamin D deficiency is caused by illness, hence it actually doesn't affect mortality and the relationship is not casual.
Don't screw around with sun protection. Despite what the internet says, people who work outside get it too.