Something I noticed after I read your comment: The funny thing about both Starbucks and McDonalds is that, in both cases, it took an outsider who became an employee, _not a founder_, to grow the company. Two companies don't a pattern make, but it does make you wonder...
If you looked at a graph of Starbucks and another startup going public at the same time the would look like this
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IPO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ../
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .founding
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IPO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ../
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./
founding----------------acquisition/