[1] https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/tesla-impact-report-2019.pdf , page 16
[2] https://ir.tesla.com/news-releases/news-release-details/tesl...
The parent seemed to be talking about cars in general, so I wasn't referring to Teslas in particular.
I can try this again using some different sources and methods.
- GDP of $1000 equates to about 1540 pounds CO2.[1]
- Each pound of CO2 implies about a kWh based on average power generation intensity.[2]
- Therefore, a $30K car implies 30 x 1540 or about 46,200 kWh.
- Divided by 15 years and by 365 days gives about 8.5 kWh per day.
So, I was probably off by a lot, and may still be off, but I feel like my point is intact, because 8.5 kWh still almost doubles the energy requirement originally stated. It's not negligible.
However you look at it, Tesla or not, 10 kWh leaves out a lot which was my original point.
Secondly, GDP to CO2 figures are a poor fit. Agriculture for example is directly 10% of US CO2 emissions but only 5.4% of GDP.
First thing that comes up when I Google:
"While an average lifespan of vehicles is not given in the IHS report, a 2014 Automotive News article stated that, at that time, the peak lifespan or “scrapping age” of a vehicle was 13 to 17 years old"
From 2014: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/autos/old-clunkers-rule-roa...
How many of these "pre-'99" models are still around? 53.3 million.
https://blogs.nicholas.duke.edu/citizenscientist/embodied-en...
The average car is a smidge under 12 years old, which is about 17kWh/day.