* The word selection in your comment isn't quite right. Linus has been known to use expletives others deem inappropriate when reviewing another human being's work - but since that's what you seem to be going for, you might as well commit to the bit.
* The big difference between your comment and Linus's rants is that he's doing it when giving feedback that other people actually requested, rather than going off at some random person on the internet.
* It seems your Linus impression is also a bit out-of-date, as he has publicly apologized for being a jerk in 2018. Maybe you were going for "vintage Linus", but it just didn't cut it for me.
Although you've nailed the attitude there, I fear the real problem in your comment writing is that it's not backed by a solid knowledge of what you're writing about. For example, it seems you wrote 80% of your comment before reading the entire article? This may be a throwback to other classic comments I'm missing - but if I missed it, then others will too, so it seems the onus is on you there.
Now that I'm done reading your whole comment, I must say I wasn't very surprised, but also not very impressed. I've read better comments than this one before, and I couldn't really tell what you were trying to achieve with it.
Next time try adding a table of contents, maybe some primary sources, or consider not attempting that kind of comment at all, if you're not confident you can pull it off? Just my two cents!