1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three-Body_Problem_(novel)
I still don't understand what the opening chapters set up or tried to explain. Maybe it was just about the political/environmental setting or maybe it starts to make sense later on...
That said, I did enjoy the books and I thought some of the 'science' profoundly novel (if occasionally wince-inducing in its unlikelihood, but hey it's science 'fiction'!)
I have a feeling that the "Dark Forest" theory is going to be accepted as a valid answer to the conundrum of the Drake equation.
"We examine these parameters, incorporating models of chemical and genetic transitions on paths to the origin of life, and show that extant scientific knowledge corresponds to uncertainties that span multiple orders of magnitude. This makes a stark difference. When the model is recast to represent realistic distributions of uncertainty, we find a substantial {\em ex ante} probability of there being no other intelligent life in our observable universe, and thus that there should be little surprise when we fail to detect any signs of it."
I finished the first book, but I couldn't deal with it either. I think it could have worked terrifically if it had been written in a satirical style like Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s The Sirens of Titan. Some of the chapters about the aliens do come across like Vonnegutian comedy, but I'm not sure if this was intended. Overall, the book takes itself very seriously.
I'm not one for subtlety if it doesn't add any insight.
The way people/groups of people/organisations/societies acted was also not realistic. They all had the same way of reacting.
Still worth a read if you can stomach the writing.
Every serious critique of the books that I came across mentions the poor character portrayals. But the story offers a view of a universe that is intrinsically hostile in a very depressing way and I did enjoy it for that.
Apparently the order of the story is different between the Chinese and English versions.
https://www.wired.com/2016/10/wired-book-club-ken-liu-interv...
The article explains the reasoning as being sensitive to the culture part of it and not the sci-fi portion.
[1] https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-11/bread-loving-...
Being able to run experiments properly is foundational for new science, but it isn't new science. Unexpected results that cannot be explained by human error (ie, bad experiments) is the origin story for new science.
So when weird results happen without any reasonable, rational explanation, everybody starts to salivate. "Growing anomalies" I expect is a bit like when the aromas start coming out of the kitchen before a big dinner is served.