I know you said Dams and not weirs and not run of river plants, and big dams have their issues, but not on the same scale as the oil industry.
I know you said Dams and not weirs and not run of river plants, and big dams have their issues, but not on the same scale as the oil industry.
There is a nice reference list, including many English language reports at the end of this report from the Swedish Agency of Marine and Water Management. [1]
I think they summarise it nicely by saying “Hydropower is one of the biggest impacts on the ecological status of a river. At the same time it is one of our most important energy sources.” [in Sweden]
Sources:
[1] https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/uppdrag--kontakt/publikation...
As I understand it a lot of the downstream ecological effects rely entirely on the fill rate the Ethiopians choose (3 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, etc). A fast fill rate (5 years or less) could have significant short to medium term effects on the arable land downstream in Sudan and especially Egypt.
The dam is oversized for its power output (to ensure it can meet peak output demands during the wet seasons) and will operate as a fish trap, cutting the number of fish able to head downstream (and ultimately to the sea / mouth of the Nile) by a significant amount.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Ethiopian_Renaissance_Da...
Even at large dams it is possible to build fish ladders to allow migration.
When we were filling our head ponds (reservoir) we weren’t allowed to impound more than 10% of the total flow in the river.