I think it's important to note that while there were a very high number of repayments, the purpose of that bailout was to transfer asset risk to the larger taxpayer body. Regardless if the initial payment price was repaid, the risk profile still is sitting somewhere.
- You value a car on your sales lot on your books: $10,000
- Real value is probably, $5,500, the spoiler and crappy tint doesn't 2x the value
- Your car is currently on fire (act of god) so value is scrap
- Buddy who runs a bank (you pay on the side because, o this ins't the first on fire car you tried to sell trash for cash) offers you $9,500, a bargin
- You are in
- 2 years later, pay off bank buddy (maybe political donation) b/c you are the one of the 9 people who can sell cars
- Throw press conference because you saved tax payers 10k + horrible risk if I failed
- Bank share holders (Tax payers) own pile of scrap
he incentives are mismanaged because the calculated risk of a bank failing is evaluated purely on the chaos induced, not the existing status quo which for joe schmoe is crazy but HFT guy can make bank off of (so sold as all upside if you are smart, but is restricted in apparent but fog like ways). Maybe said bank is actually terrible, but we won't know because they are a rise together, never fall together cartel (malicious or not, fact of reality)