This was a very strange, disconnected and fragmented article by the New Yorker
Why dint they break down the supply chain linearly?
Why dint they break down the supply chain linearly?
This article is not the best of its kind, but it is very, very good. Writing that excels it would frustrate you more, in proportion to its quality. The frustration you feel reading it is a pale echo of that experienced by the myriad scientists and amateurs who puzzled in and out of decades over these questions, originally obscure but enlarged by their obdurity to have become symbolic of questions of our own existence.
Your bloviation about great writing offers nothing except a great example of a style you won't find in the New Yorker.
From the New Yorker!
If you don't like long form articles and you see it is the New Yorker, then don't read it.