Which facts that he posted were inaccurate? And note that I'm not talking about his opinions based on the facts, but rather the facts that he used as evidence?

UPDATE: I'm not trying to be snarky here. I'm very interested in this situation and want a clearer picture of it, and it would be nice if someone who understands the complexities of this matter would comment, as the facts in the original post (which is now being slammed) seemed to indicate at the very least cautious optimism.

(FYI, the post that was originally on the FP has moved here: http://mitnse.com/)