From the sound of it, I'm not sure what more they could have done. Are there many people in England who disagree with all major religions on this point?
Like, if organ donation is the default, at the very best, it's extra work for people who want not to donate their organs after death.
OTOH if organ donation is not the default, dramatically fewer organs are available to people in need, and many of them will die.
How are we supposed to weigh these competing harms?
If you want to leave the country, you may renounce your citizenship upon becoming an adult.
Uh, no, you can't opt out of being governed altogether. This is why libertarianism is a thing — the state is a categorically different kind of entity due to the monopoly on violence. Tax compliance is ultimately enforced at gunpoint, just like every other law, and that's why it really fucking matters to get the laws right. Haven't we been over this?
> If you want to leave the country, you may renounce your citizenship upon becoming an adult.
You are being very generous, and indeed this is one of the last remaining freedoms we have that people in the eastern block did not.
Where to go though if all countries compete in becoming the most oppressive one?
> Your family will still be approached and your faith, beliefs and culture will continue to be respected.