Radioactivity detected 60 miles from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant
seattletimes.nwsource.com
seattletimes.nwsource.com
So no, the article is very wrong in this point. In the event of a full melt-down, they'll have another completely useless reactor (pumping sea-water to cool it will require a new containment vessel due to corrosion anyway). It's hard enough keeping people informed of how safe nuclear power actually is without journalists constantly spreading FUD.
In short hand, once the rods are in, its game over, just a question of how hard the final result is to clean up.
If you keep it under the melting point of the core you can just pull the fuel and dispose of it in the normal way, if not you have to clean out the non-critical slag core.